English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Closing the Future: Environmental Research and the Management of Conflicting Future Value Orders

Andersson, J., & Westholm, E. (2019). Closing the Future: Environmental Research and the Management of Conflicting Future Value Orders. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(2), 237-262. doi:10.1177/0162243918791263.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
STHV_44_2019_Andersson.pdf (Any fulltext), 449KB
Name:
STHV_44_2019_Andersson.pdf
Description:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Not specified
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918791263 (Publisher version)
Description:
Full text open access via publisher
OA-Status:
Not specified

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Andersson, Jenny1, 2, Author           
Westholm, Erik3, Author
Affiliations:
1Assoziierte Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_2074316              
2Max Planck Sciences Po Center on Coping with Instability in Market Societies (MaxPo), MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1631137              
3Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SLU – Department of Urban and Rural Development, Uppsala, Sweden, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: environmental practices, epistemology, futures, alternative life forms, politics, power, governance, space/place/scale dynamics
 Abstract: This paper examines a struggle over the future use of Nordic forests, which took place from 2009 to 2012 within a major research program, Future Forests—Sustainable Strategies under Uncertainty and Risk, organized and funded by Mistra, The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research. We explore the role of strategic environmental research in societal constructions of long-term challenges and future risks. Specifically, we draw attention to the role played by environmental research in the creation of future images that become dominant for how societies structure action for the long term. We also show that this process is on several accounts problematic. Research labeled “strategic” or “relevant” is intended to manage long-term risks and challenges in a sustainable way, by taking into account the “open” and “plural” nature of the future. The case of Future Forests suggests, rather, that by contributing to the emergence of dominant future images, environmental research is entangled with a process of gradual consensus creation around what may be highly selective or biased narratives of the long term, which may conceal or postpone key forms of future conflict.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2018-08-162019
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1177/0162243918791263
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Science, Technology, & Human Values
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 44 (2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 237 - 262 Identifier: ISSN: 0162-2439
ISSN: 0738-2618
ISSN: 1546-315X
ISSN: 1552-8251