English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Theory of a Phantom : The Principles Theory’s Futile Quest for its Object

Poscher, R. (2015). Theory of a Phantom: The Principles Theory’s Futile Quest for its Object. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie: Beiheft, 144, 129-148.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Poscher, Ralf1, Author              
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: In his theory of fundamental rights, Robert Alexy has taken up Ronald Dworkin’s distinction between rules and principles and developed it into an all-encompassing principles theory of fundamental rights and in later works of law in general. The principles theory presupposes the existence of legal principles. At first sight, this seems a fairly unsuspicious assumption, since legal principles have formed part of the inventory of our legal universe for ages. But when the principles theory refers to legal principles, it does not refer to the rich diversity of traditional legal principles like the standard of the reasonable man, good faith, and the like. When the principles theory refers to legal principles, it refers to a theoretical dualism, according to which there are only two kinds of norms: rules, which allow for precise subsumption, and principles, which were originally associated with optimization requirements. When Alexy discovered that optimization requirements have all the characteristics that his theory associates with rules, he started a quest to rediscover the object of his theory. He now proposes that principles are an “ideal ought”. The article challenges Alexy’s attempt to reconstruct the object of his theory. It shows why the distinction between rules and principles as proposed by the principle theory is theoretically misguided. The principles theory should give up on its attempt to promote doctrinal conceptions in specific fields of the law – most prominently of fundamental rights as optimization requirements – with misguided theoretical concepts. If it wants to promote its balancing idea in an area of the law, it cannot do so from the high road of legal theory, but has to support it with doctrinal arguments, which most of the time, though, support more differentiated approaches.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2015
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: -
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie : Beiheft
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Berlin : Verlag für Staatswissenschaften und Geschichte
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 144 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 129 - 148 Identifier: ISSN: 0001-2343
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/110992357244018

Source 2

show
hide
Title: Proceedings of the Special Workshop “Alexy’s Theory of Law” held at the 26th World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy in Belo Horizonte (2013)
Source Genre: Issue
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -