Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Global Non-Potential Magnetic Models of the Solar Corona During the March 2015 Eclipse

Yeates, A. R., Amari, T., Contopoulos, I., Feng, X., Mackay, D. H., Mikić, Z., et al. (2018). Global Non-Potential Magnetic Models of the Solar Corona During the March 2015 Eclipse. Space Science Reviews, 214: 99. doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0534-1.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Yeates, Anthony R., Autor
Amari, Tahar, Autor
Contopoulos, Ioannis, Autor
Feng, Xueshang, Autor
Mackay, Duncan H., Autor
Mikić, Zoran, Autor
Wiegelmann, Thomas1, Autor           
Hutton, Joseph, Autor
Lowder, Christopher A., Autor
Morgan, Huw, Autor
Petrie, Gordon, Autor
Rachmeler, Laurel A., Autor
Upton, Lisa A., Autor
Canou, Aurelien, Autor
Chopin, Pierre, Autor
Downs, Cooper, Autor
Druckmüller, Miloslav, Autor
Linker, Jon A., Autor
Seaton, Daniel B., Autor
Török, Tibor, Autor
Affiliations:
1Department Sun and Heliosphere, Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Max Planck Society, ou_1832289              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Magnetic fields Sun: surface magnetism Sun: corona
 Zusammenfassung: Seven different models are applied to the same problem of simulating the Sun’s coronal magnetic field during the solar eclipse on 2015 March 20. All of the models are non-potential, allowing for free magnetic energy, but the associated electric currents are developed in significantly different ways. This is not a direct comparison of the coronal modelling techniques, in that the different models also use different photospheric boundary conditions, reflecting the range of approaches currently used in the community. Despite the significant differences, the results show broad agreement in the overall magnetic topology. Among those models with significant volume currents in much of the corona, there is general agreement that the ratio of total to potential magnetic energy should be approximately 1.4. However, there are significant differences in the electric current distributions; while static extrapolations are best able to reproduce active regions, they are unable to recover sheared magnetic fields in filament channels using currently available vector magnetogram data. By contrast, time-evolving simulations can recover the filament channel fields at the expense of not matching the observed vector magnetic fields within active regions. We suggest that, at present, the best approach may be a hybrid model using static extrapolations but with additional energization informed by simplified evolution models. This is demonstrated by one of the models.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2018
 Publikationsstatus: Online veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1007/s11214-018-0534-1
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Space Science Reviews
  Kurztitel : Space Sci Rev
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 214 Artikelnummer: 99 Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: ISSN: 0038-6308
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925446718