Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Are strong empathizers better mentalizers?: Evidence for independence and interaction between the routes of social cognition

Kanske, P., Böckler, A., Trautwein, F.-M., Parianen Lesemann, F. H., & Singer, T. (2016). Are strong empathizers better mentalizers?: Evidence for independence and interaction between the routes of social cognition. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(9), 1382-1392. doi:10.1093/scan/nsw052.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
Kanske_Böckler_2016.pdf (Verlagsversion), 528KB
Name:
Kanske_Böckler_2016.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Kanske, Philipp1, Autor           
Böckler, Anne1, 2, Autor           
Trautwein, Fynn-Mathis1, Autor           
Parianen Lesemann, Franca H.1, Autor           
Singer, Tania1, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Department Social Neuroscience, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634552              
2Department of Psychology, Julius Maximilian University, Würzburg, Germany, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Social cognition; Empathy; Theory of mind; Mentalizing; fMRI; Dynamic causal modeling.
 Zusammenfassung: Although the processes that underlie sharing others’ emotions (empathy) and understanding others’ mental states (mentalizing, Theory of Mind) have received increasing attention, it is yet unclear how they relate to each other. For instance, are people who strongly empathize with others also more proficient in mentalizing? And (how) do the neural networks supporting empathy and mentalizing interact? Assessing both functions simultaneously in a large sample (N = 178), we show that people’s capacities to empathize and mentalize are independent, both on a behavioral and neural level. Thus, strong empathizers are not necessarily proficient mentalizers, arguing against a general capacity of social understanding. Second, we applied dynamic causal modeling to investigate how the neural networks underlying empathy and mentalizing are orchestrated in naturalistic social settings. Results reveal that in highly emotional situations, empathic sharing can inhibit mentalizing-related activity and thereby harm mentalizing performance. Taken together, our findings speak against a unitary construct of social understanding and suggest flexible interplay of distinct social functions.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2016-04-112015-11-122016-04-122016-04-282016-09
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw052
PMID: 27129794
PMC: PMC5015801
Anderer: Epub 2016
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
  Andere : SCAN
  Kurztitel : Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Oxford : Oxford University Press
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 11 (9) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 1382 - 1392 Identifikator: ISSN: 1749-5016
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/1000000000223760