English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  High N2O and CO2 emissions from bare peat dams reduce the climate mitigation potential of bog rewetting practices

Vybornova, O., van Asperen, H., Pfeiffer, E.-M., & Kutzbach, L. (2019). High N2O and CO2 emissions from bare peat dams reduce the climate mitigation potential of bog rewetting practices. Mires and Peat, 24: 4. doi:10.19189/MaP.2017.SNPG.304.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Vybornova, O.1, Author
van Asperen, H.1, Author
Pfeiffer, Eva-Maria2, Author           
Kutzbach, Lars2, 3, Author           
Affiliations:
1external, ou_persistent22              
2B 2 - Land Use and Land Cover Change, Research Area B: Climate Manifestations and Impacts, The CliSAP Cluster of Excellence, External Organizations, ou_1863482              
3CRG Regional Hydrology in Terrestrial Systems, Research Area B: Climate Manifestations and Impacts, The CliSAP Cluster of Excellence, External Organizations, ou_2025292              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Greenhouse gas emissions, Ombrotrophic mire, Peatland, Restoration
 Abstract: The rewetting of drained peatlands is currently a common practice for re-establishing near-natural hydrological conditions and for reducing peatland greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, especially of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O), which are enhanced under peatland drainage and extraction. In the originally bare and drained peatland Himmelmoor (Quickborn, Germany), the rewetting process started stepwise in 2004 by blocking drainage ditches with peat as well as by creating polders surrounded by peat dams. In this research we examined differences in CO 2 , methane (CH 4 ) and N 2 O emissions between a flooded (FL) area, a bare peat dam (PD) area and an abandoned (but still drained) extraction (E) area during a period in 2012 and during a period of two years in 2014-2016. The results showed that all study areas were GHG sources, although large differences were identified between the different sites. Winter CO 2 emissions from all sites (FL, PD, E) were within the range previously reported for rewetted peatlands, but summer CO 2 emissions from PD (1-20 µmol m -2 s -1 ) strongly exceeded the reported average range for similar surfaces. Very low and irregular CH 4 fluxes were detected at both PD and FL, ranging from -6 to 24 nmol m -2 s -1 at PD and from -13 to 49 nmol m -2 s -1 at FL. In comparison to other peatlands, the observed N 2 O emissions were high, especially at the PD sites with maximum daily means of 23 nmol m -2 s -1 in the summer of 2012. In general, the flooded excavation sites (FL) showed lower GHG emissions than the not-rewetted excavation area (E). Also, despite the relatively small coverage of the peat dams (PD), these areas showed a larger total GHG emission than the E and FL sites. This negative effect of peat dams during the first years after flooding could be mitigated by stimulating their colonisation by moss or heath vegetation, which reduces the soil N pool and thus can be expected to reduce N2O fluxes from the peat dams. © 2019 International Mire Conservation Group and International Peatland Society.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2019-03-31
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.19189/MaP.2017.SNPG.304
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Mires and Peat
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 24 Sequence Number: 4 Start / End Page: - Identifier: -