English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  No language unification without neural feedback: How awareness affects sentence processing

Mongelli, V., Meijs, E. L., Van Gaal, S., & Hagoort, P. (2019). No language unification without neural feedback: How awareness affects sentence processing. Neuroimage, 202: 116063. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116063.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Mongelli_2019_etal.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
Mongelli_2019_etal.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Mongelli, Valeria1, 2, 3, 4, Author           
Meijs, Erik L.5, Author
Van Gaal, Simon3, 4, 5, Author
Hagoort, Peter1, 5, Author           
Affiliations:
1Neurobiology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792551              
2International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_1119545              
3Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
4Amsterdam Brain and Cognition (ABC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
5Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations, ou_55236              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: How does the human brain combine a finite number of words to form an infinite variety of sentences? According to the Memory, Unification and Control (MUC) model, sentence processing requires long-range feedback from the left inferior frontal cortex (LIFC) to left posterior temporal cortex (LPTC). Single word processing however may only require feedforward propagation of semantic information from sensory regions to LPTC. Here we tested the claim that long-range feedback is required for sentence processing by reducing visual awareness of words using a masking technique. Masking disrupts feedback processing while leaving feedforward processing relatively intact. Previous studies have shown that masked single words still elicit an N400 ERP effect, a neural signature of semantic incongruency. However, whether multiple words can be combined to form a sentence under reduced levels of awareness is controversial. To investigate this issue, we performed two experiments in which we measured electroencephalography (EEG) while 40 subjects performed a masked priming task. Words were presented either successively or simultaneously, thereby forming a short sentence that could be congruent or incongruent with a target picture. This sentence condition was compared with a typical single word condition. In the masked condition we only found an N400 effect for single words, whereas in the unmasked condition we observed an N400 effect for both unmasked sentences and single words. Our findings suggest that long-range feedback processing is required for sentence processing, but not for single word processing.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2019-07-302019-07-31
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116063
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Neuroimage
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 202 Sequence Number: 116063 Start / End Page: - Identifier: -