English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Response to Garcia and Dunn: no evidence that maximum fundamental frequency reflects selection for signal diminution in bonobos

Grawunder, S., Crockford, C., Kalan, A. K., Clay, Z., Stoessel, A., & Hohmann, G. (2019). Response to Garcia and Dunn: no evidence that maximum fundamental frequency reflects selection for signal diminution in bonobos. Current Biology, 29(15), R734-R735. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.023.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
shh2359.pdf (Publisher version), 256KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
shh2359.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Private
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Grawunder, Sven, Author
Crockford, Catherine, Author
Kalan, Ammie. K., Author
Clay, Zanna, Author
Stoessel, Alexander1, Author           
Hohmann, Gottfried, Author
Affiliations:
1Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society, ou_2074310              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Garcia and Dunn [1] raise some interesting and valuable points regarding our recent paper in Current Biology [2]. As Garcia and Dunn [1] point out, cross-species variation in vocal and anatomical relations allows for the identification of relevant outliers from the body size — fundamental frequency (f0) regression. However, this depends on the premise that the chosen or available f0 and body size values are typical of the species. A motivation for our study [2] was in part to improve the accuracy of such estimates by providing more data per species compared to previous studies. We address each point of their critique by controlling for cross-species body size variation using body weights for chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and bonobos (Pan paniscus), addressing potential call variation in different subspecies of Pan troglodytes, measuring minimum f0 as well as maximum f0 and possible effects caused by different larynx fixation methods. Grawunder et al. Respond to the concerns raised by Garcia and Dunn on their original study.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2019-08-052019-08-05
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: 2
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.06.023
Other: shh2359
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Current Biology
  Other : Curr. Biol.
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: London, UK : Cell Press
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 29 (15) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: R734 - R735 Identifier: ISSN: 0960-9822
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925579107