English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  After the End of History

Schäfer, A. (2019). After the End of History. Talk presented at Scholar in Residence Lectures Series 2019. Köln. 2019-11-19.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
mpifg_v19_1911.mp4 (Supplementary material), 58MB
Name:
mpifg_v19_1911.mp4
Description:
Complete lecture podcast open access
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
video/mp4 / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
https://vimeo.com/379745213 (Supplementary material)
Description:
Complete lecture podcast

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Schäfer, Armin1, Author              
Affiliations:
1Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany , ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: In 1989, Francis Fukuyama famously predicted the End of History. Although not all countries were democratic at the time, he maintained that there were no credible rivals to the idea of “liberal democracy” left. Free markets and political freedom were close allies from his point of view. Empirical research about the spread of democracy supported Fukuyama’s bold claims—in several waves, the total and relative number of democracies had been rising across the world, reaching unprecedented levels. However, since the 1990s, a much soberer view has replaced his teleological optimism and there are signs of democratic decay even in some of the most long-standing democracies. This lecture discusses the reasons for the contemporary sense of crisis and looks at empirical evidence for democratic decline across the world. In his series of three lectures, Armin Schäfer wants to assess and explain why there is a crisis of democracy. Following the rise of populist parties, many observers have painted a dark picture of the state of democracy. Not a few of them recommend less democracy as a reaction to these trends. If voters turn towards parties that challenge liberal democracy, so the logic goes, then one has to minimize their influence on political decisions. Against these claims to save democracy from its citizens, he aims to defend democracy and democratic equality. If democracy does not work the way it is supposed to, one should seek ways to improve it rather than blaming those who are disappointed and feel poorly represented. Doing so means asking how substantive and descriptive representation are linked and how many decisions can be delegated to non-majoritarian institutions without hollowing out democracy itself.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2019
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: -
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: Scholar in Residence Lectures Series 2019
Place of Event: Köln
Start-/End Date: 2019-11-19

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Scholar in Residence Lectures Series 2019
Source Genre: Series
 Creator(s):
MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, Editor              
Affiliations:
-
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -