English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Does logically incoherent decision-making really have negative consequences?

Does logically incoherent decision-making really have negative consequences?. doi:10.21036/LTPUB10288.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Gigerenzer, Gerd1, 2, Author           
Affiliations:
1Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Max Planck Society, Lentzeallee 94, D-14195 Berlin, ou_2074291              
2Center for Adaptive Behavior and Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Max Planck Society, Lentzeallee 94, D-14195 Berlin , ou_2074285              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: As explained in this video it is commonly assumed that logically incoherent decision-making is irrational and costly in that it can lead e.g. to a decrease in happiness or health. An example for this would be a patient reacting differently if doctors speak of a 90% success rate of a surgery instead of a 10% failure rate for the same procedure. The purpose of the study presented here was to examine if there is proof in the existing literature that incoherent decision-making actually has negative consequences and is rightly seen as irrational. According to GERD GIGERENZER the findings suggest that the above mentioned assumption is not correct and that rationality needs to be re-defined in moving away from being based on strictly mathematical probabilities to taking context into account.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2016-06-2220162016
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.21036/LTPUB10288
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source

show