English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Evaluating the EC Private Data Sharing Principles: Setting a Mantra for Artificial Intelligence Nirvana?

Gonzalez Otero, B. (2019). Evaluating the EC Private Data Sharing Principles: Setting a Mantra for Artificial Intelligence Nirvana? Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 10(1), 66-84.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-99CD-9 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-99D0-4
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Gonzalez Otero, Begoña1, Author              
Affiliations:
1MPI for Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Max Planck Society, ou_830549              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Artificial intelligence best practices data access data re-use data sharing self-regulation standard contract terms the internet of things
 Abstract: On April 25, 2018, the European Commission (EC) published a series of communications related to data trading and artificial intelligence. One of them called “Towards a Common European Data Space”, came with a working document: “Guidance on Sharing Private Sector Data in the European Data Economy”. Both the Communication and the guidance introduce two different sets of general principles addressing data sharing, contractual best practices for business-to-business (B2B), and business-to-government (B2G) environments. On the same day, the EC also published a legislative proposal to review the Public Sector (PSI) Directive. These two simultaneous actions are part of a major package of measures, which aim to facilitate the creation of a common data space in the EU and foster European artificial intelligence development. This article focuses on the first action, the “Guidance on Sharing Private Sector Data in the European Economy”. First, because it is one of its kind. Second, although these principles do not qualify as soft law (lacking binding force but having legal effects) the Commission’s communications set action plans for future legislation. Third, because the ultimate goal of these principles is to boost European artificial intelligence (AI) development. However, do these principles set a viable legal framework for data sharing, or is this public policy tool merely a naïve expectation? Moreover, would these principles set a successful path toward a thriving European AI advancement? In this contribution, I try to sketch some answers to these and related questions.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2019
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: -
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law
  Abbreviation : JIPITEC
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Karlsruhe ; Hannover ; Göttingen
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 10 (1) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 66 - 84 Identifier: ISSN: 2190-3387
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/2190-3387