English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Differences in strategic abilities but not associative processes explain memory development

Mueller, N., Kohn, N., Van Buuren, M., Klijn, N., Emmen, H., Berkers, R., et al. (2019). Differences in strategic abilities but not associative processes explain memory development. bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/693895.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Müller_Kohn_2019.pdf (Preprint), 2MB
Name:
Müller_Kohn_2019.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Mueller, Nils1, Author
Kohn, Nils1, Author
Van Buuren, Mariet2, Author
Klijn, Nadia1, Author
Emmen, Helene1, Author
Berkers, Ruud1, 3, Author           
Dresdler, M.1, 4, Author
Janzen, G.1, 5, Author
Fernandez, Guillen1, Author
Affiliations:
1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
2Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
3Max Planck Research Group Adaptive Memory, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_2295691              
4Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany, ou_persistent22              
5Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Children’s learning capabilities change while growing up. One framework that describes the cognitive and neural development of children’s growing learning abilities is the two-component model. It distinguishes processes that integrate separate features into a coherent memory representation (associative component) and executive abilities, such as elaboration, evaluation and monitoring, that support memory processing (strategic component). In an fMRI study using an object-location association paradigm, we investigated how the two components influence memory performance across development. We tested children (10-12 yrs., n=31), late adolescents (18 yrs., n=29) and adults (25+ yrs., n=30) of either sex. For studying the associative component, we also probed how the utilisation of prior knowledge (schemas) facilitates memory across age groups. Children had overall lower retrieval performance, while adolescents and adults did not differ from each other. All groups benefitted from schemas, but this effect did not differ between groups. Performance differences between groups were associated with deactivation of the dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC), which in turn was linked to executive functioning. These patterns were stronger in adolescents and adults and seemed absent in children. This pattern of results suggests the children’s executive system, the strategic component, is not as mature and thus cannot facilitate memory performance in the same way as in adolescents/adults. In contrast, we did not find age-related differences in the associative component; with activity in the angular gyrus predicting memory performance systematically across groups. Overall our results suggest that differences of executive rather than associative abilities explain memory differences between children, adolescents and adults.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2019-07-05
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: No review
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1101/693895
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: bioRxiv
Source Genre: Web Page
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -