English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  When temporal prediction errs: ERP responses to delayed action-feedback onset

Pinheiro, A. P., Schwartze, M., Gutierrez, F., & Kotz, S. A. (2019). When temporal prediction errs: ERP responses to delayed action-feedback onset. Neuropsychologia, 134: 107200. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107200.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-DA70-8 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-DA71-7
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Pinheiro, Ana P.1, 2, Author
Schwartze, Michael2, Author
Gutierrez, Francisco1, Author
Kotz, Sonja A.2, 3, Author              
Affiliations:
1Faculty of Psychology, University of Lisbon, Portugal, ou_persistent22              
2Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, the Netherlands, ou_persistent22              
3Department Neuropsychology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634551              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Temporal prediction; Sensory attenuation; Feedback delay; Prediction error; Internal forward models; ERP
 Abstract: Sensory suppression effects observed in electroencephalography (EEG) index successful predictions of the type and timing of self-generated sensory feedback. However, it is unclear how precise the timing prediction of sensory feedback is, and how temporal delays between an action and its sensory feedback affect perception. The current study investigated how prediction errors induced by delaying tone onset times affect the processing of sensory feedback in audition. Participants listened to self-generated (via button press) or externally generated tones. Self-generated tones were presented either without or with various delays (50, 100, or 250 ms; in 30% of trials). Comparing listening to externally generated and self-generated tones resulted in action-related P50 amplitude suppression to tones presented immediately or 100 ms after the button press. Subsequent ERP responses became more sensitive to the type of delay. Whereas the comparison of actual and predicted sensory feedback (N1) tolerated temporal uncertainty up to 100 ms, P2 suppression was modulated by delay in a graded manner: suppression decreased with an increase in sensory feedback delay. Self-generated tones occurring 250 ms after the button press additionally elicited an enhanced N2 response. These findings suggest functionally dissociable processes within the forward model that are affected by the timing of sensory feedback to self-action: relative tolerance of temporal delay in the P50 and N1, confirming previous results, but increased sensitivity in the P2. Further, they indicate that temporal prediction errors are treated differently by the auditory system: only delays that occurred after a temporal integration window (∼100 ms) impact the conscious detection of altered sensory feedback.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2019-09-182019-01-202019-09-192019-09-232019-11
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107200
Other: Epub ahead of print
PMID: 31557484
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Neuropsychologia
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Oxford : Pergamon
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 134 Sequence Number: 107200 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 0028-3932
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925428258