日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

  Test–Retest Reliability of the Brain Metabolites GABA and Glx With JPRESS, PRESS, and MEGA‐PRESS MRS Sequences in vivo at 3T

Baeshen, A., Wyss, P., Henning, A., O'Gorman, R., Piccirelli, M., Kollias, S., & Michels, L. (2020). Test–Retest Reliability of the Brain Metabolites GABA and Glx With JPRESS, PRESS, and MEGA‐PRESS MRS Sequences in vivo at 3T. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 51(4), 1181-1191. doi:10.1002/jmri.26921.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
アイテムのパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-F697-C 版のパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-E0E3-D
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル

関連URL

表示:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Baeshen, A, 著者
Wyss, PO1, 2, 著者           
Henning, A1, 2, 著者           
O'Gorman, RL, 著者
Piccirelli, M, 著者
Kollias, S, 著者
Michels, L, 著者
所属:
1Research Group MR Spectroscopy and Ultra-High Field Methodology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2528692              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: -
 要旨: Background

The optimization of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) sequences allows improved diagnosis and prognosis of neurological and psychological disorders. Thus, to assess the test–retest and intersequence reliability of such MRS sequences in quantifying metabolite concentrations is of clinical relevance.
Purpose

To evaluate the test–retest and intersequence reliability of three MRS sequences to estimate GABA and Glx = Glutamine+Glutamate concentrations in the human brain.
Study Type

Prospective.
Subjects

Eighteen healthy participants were scanned twice (range: 1 day to 1 week between the two sessions) with identical protocols.
Field Strength/Sequence

3T using a 32‐channel SENSE head coil in the PCC region; PRESS, JPRESS, and MEGA‐PRESS sequences.
Assessment

Metabolite concentrations were estimated using LCModel (for PRESS and MEGA‐PRESS) and ProFit2 (for JPRESS).
Statistical Tests

The test–retest reliability was evaluated by Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests, Pearson's r correlation coefficients, intraclass‐correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV), and by Bland–Altman (BA) plots. The intersequence reliability was assessed with Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests, Pearson's r correlation coefficients, and BA plots.
Results

For GABA, only the MEGA‐PRESS sequence showed a moderate test–retest correlation (r = 0.54, ICC = 0.5, CV = 8.8%) and the BA plots indicated good agreement (P > 0.05) for all sequences. JPRESS provided less precise results and PRESS was insensitive to GABA. For Glx, the r and ICC values for PRESS (r = 0.87, ICC = 0.9, CV = 2.9%) and MEGA‐PRESS (r = 0.70, ICC = 0.7, CV = 5.3%) reflect higher correlations, compared with JPRESS (r = 0.39, ICC = 0.4, CV = 20.1%).

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語:
 日付: 2019-102020-04
 出版の状態: 出版
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: -
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26921
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
種別: 学術雑誌
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: Chicago, IL : Society for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
ページ: - 巻号: 51 (4) 通巻号: - 開始・終了ページ: 1181 - 1191 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): ISSN: 1053-1807
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925594512