English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Test–Retest Reliability of the Brain Metabolites GABA and Glx With JPRESS, PRESS, and MEGA‐PRESS MRS Sequences in vivo at 3T

Baeshen, A., Wyss, P., Henning, A., O'Gorman, R., Piccirelli, M., Kollias, S., et al. (2019). Test–Retest Reliability of the Brain Metabolites GABA and Glx With JPRESS, PRESS, and MEGA‐PRESS MRS Sequences in vivo at 3T. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Epub ahead. doi:10.1002/jmri.26921.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Description:
-
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Baeshen, A, Author
Wyss, PO1, 2, Author           
Henning, A1, 2, Author           
O'Gorman, RL, Author
Piccirelli, M, Author
Kollias, S, Author
Michels, L, Author
Affiliations:
1Research Group MR Spectroscopy and Ultra-High Field Methodology, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2528692              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract:
Background

The optimization of magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) sequences allows improved diagnosis and prognosis of neurological and psychological disorders. Thus, to assess the test–retest and intersequence reliability of such MRS sequences in quantifying metabolite concentrations is of clinical relevance.
Purpose

To evaluate the test–retest and intersequence reliability of three MRS sequences to estimate GABA and Glx = Glutamine+Glutamate concentrations in the human brain.
Study Type

Prospective.
Subjects

Eighteen healthy participants were scanned twice (range: 1 day to 1 week between the two sessions) with identical protocols.
Field Strength/Sequence

3T using a 32‐channel SENSE head coil in the PCC region; PRESS, JPRESS, and MEGA‐PRESS sequences.
Assessment

Metabolite concentrations were estimated using LCModel (for PRESS and MEGA‐PRESS) and ProFit2 (for JPRESS).
Statistical Tests

The test–retest reliability was evaluated by Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests, Pearson's r correlation coefficients, intraclass‐correlation coefficients (ICC), coefficients of variation (CV), and by Bland–Altman (BA) plots. The intersequence reliability was assessed with Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests, Pearson's r correlation coefficients, and BA plots.
Results

For GABA, only the MEGA‐PRESS sequence showed a moderate test–retest correlation (r = 0.54, ICC = 0.5, CV = 8.8%) and the BA plots indicated good agreement (P > 0.05) for all sequences. JPRESS provided less precise results and PRESS was insensitive to GABA. For Glx, the r and ICC values for PRESS (r = 0.87, ICC = 0.9, CV = 2.9%) and MEGA‐PRESS (r = 0.70, ICC = 0.7, CV = 5.3%) reflect higher correlations, compared with JPRESS (r = 0.39, ICC = 0.4, CV = 20.1%).

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2019-10
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26921
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Chicago, IL : Society for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Pages: - Volume / Issue: Epub ahead Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 1053-1807
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925594512