English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Comparison of extraction methods for recovering ancient microbial DNA from paleofeces

Hagan, R., Hofman, C. A., Hübner, A., Reinhard, K., Schnorr, S., Lewis Jr, C. M., et al. (2020). Comparison of extraction methods for recovering ancient microbial DNA from paleofeces. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 171(2): ajpa.23978, pp. 275-284. doi:10.1002/ajpa.23978.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
shh2475.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
shh2475.pdf
Description:
OA
OA-Status:
Hybrid
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Hagan, Richard1, Author           
Hofman, Courtney A., Author
Hübner, Alexander1, Author           
Reinhard, Karl, Author
Schnorr, Stephanie, Author
Lewis Jr, Cecil M., Author
Sankaranarayanan, Krithivasan, Author
Warinner, Christina G.1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society, ou_2074310              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: ancient DNA, coprolite, gut microbiome, paleogenomics
 Abstract: Objectives
Paleofeces are valuable to archeologists and evolutionary biologists for their potential to yield health, dietary, and host information. As a rich source of preserved biomolecules from host-associated microorganisms, they can also provide insights into the recent evolution and changing ecology of the gut microbiome. However, there is currently no standard method for DNA extraction from paleofeces, which combine the dual challenges of complex biological composition and degraded DNA. Due to the scarcity and relatively poor preservation of paleofeces when compared with other archeological remains, it is important to use efficient methods that maximize ancient DNA (aDNA) recovery while also minimizing downstream taxonomic biases.

Methods
In this study, we use shotgun metagenomics to systematically compare the performance of five DNA extraction methods on a set of well-preserved human and dog paleofeces from Mexico (~1,300 BP).

Results
Our results show that all tested DNA extraction methods yield a consistent microbial taxonomic profile, but that methods optimized for ancient samples recover significantly more DNA.

Conclusions
These results show promise for future studies that seek to explore the evolution of the human gut microbiome by comparing aDNA data with those generated in modern studies.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2019-08-132019-11-092019-11-302020-02
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: 10
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: 1 Introduction
2 Material and methods
2.1 Samples and study design
2.2 DNA extraction
2.2.1 Extraction Method A: Human Microbiome Project protocol with PowerSoil kit
2.2.2 Extraction Method B: Modified MinElute protocol
2.2.3 Extraction Method C: Phenol-chloroform + modified MinElute protocol
2.2.4 Extraction Method D: Split modified MinElute protocol
2.2.5 Extraction Method E: HMP protocol + modified MinElute protocol
2.3 Library construction and sequencing
2.4 Data analysis
2.4.1 Data filtering and quality control
2.4.2 Assessment of method impact on DNA yield
2.4.3 Microbial community profiling
2.4.4 Assessment of paleofeces microbial preservation
2.4.5 Host determination of paleofeces
3 Results and discussion
3.1 DNA recovery by extraction method
3.2 Effect of DNA extraction protocol on microbial community reconstruction
3.3 Gut microbiome preservation
3.4 Host confirmation of paleofeces
4 Conclusions
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23978
Other: shh2475
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: American Journal of Physical Anthropology
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: New York, NY : Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 171 (2) Sequence Number: ajpa.23978 Start / End Page: 275 - 284 Identifier: ISSN: 0002-9483
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954926960915