English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Cognacy and computational cladistics: issues in determining lexical cognacy for Indo-European cladistic research

Scarborough, M. (2019). Cognacy and computational cladistics: issues in determining lexical cognacy for Indo-European cladistic research. In M. Serangeli, & T. Olander (Eds.), Dispersals and diversification: linguistic and archaeological perspectives on the early stages of Indo-European (pp. 54-76). Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004416192_011.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
shh2495.pdf (Publisher version), 664KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
shh2495.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Private
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
Access via OPAC (Publisher version)
Description:
-

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Scarborough, Matthew1, Author              
Affiliations:
1Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society, ou_2074311              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Cladistic hypotheses are ideally based on arguments that use cumulative evidence from a wide range of shared innovations inherited from a more recent ancestor. The majority of historical linguists would agree that the best evidence for subgrouping would be shared phonological and morphological innovations, while evidence from proportions of shared lexical cognacy is less reliable for linguistic subgrouping. Recent high-profile studies have appeared, however, that have been based exclusively on comparative lexical material. The results of these methods have been sharply criticised, but in spite of the criticisms to cognacy-based approaches, there remains some potential that the lexical cognacy may provide some useful data to supplement cladistic hypotheses as part of an overall assessment of the complete bundle of available isoglosses. If lexical cognacy judgements can be treated as a potential source of data for cladistic hypotheses, how can they be implemented in a methodologically rigorous way? This chapter focuses on case studies from methodological issues that have arisen in encoding Indo-European lexical cognacy data on the Indo-European Cognate Relationships (IE-CoR) database project based at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. These issues are illustrated through case studies from problems that have arisen in assigning cognacy coding to lexical data. As such this chapter contributes a discussion towards improving the reliability of cognacy data for cladistic analyses as a supplement to more traditional analyses based on comparative phonological and morphological criteria.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2019-12-062019-12-19
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: 30
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1163/9789004416192_011
Other: shh2495
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Dispersals and diversification: linguistic and archaeological perspectives on the early stages of Indo-European
Source Genre: Book
 Creator(s):
Serangeli, Matilde, Editor
Olander, Thomas, Editor
Affiliations:
-
Publ. Info: Leiden : Brill
Pages: xii, 290 Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: 9 Start / End Page: 54 - 76 Identifier: ISBN: 978-90-04-41619-2
ISBN: 978-90-04-41450-1

Source 2

show
hide
Title: Brill's Studies in Indo-European languages & linguistics
Source Genre: Series
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Leiden : Brill
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 19 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 1875-6328