Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

EndNote (UTF-8)
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Reducing Uncertainty in Scholarly Publishing: Concepts in the Field of Organization Studies, 1960–2008

Bort, S., & Schiller-Merkens, S. (2011). Reducing Uncertainty in Scholarly Publishing: Concepts in the Field of Organization Studies, 1960–2008. Schmalenbach Business Review, 63(4), 337-360. doi:10.1007/BF03396823.

Item is

Basisdaten

ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

ausblenden: Dateien
:
SBR_63_2011_SchillerMerkens.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 271KB
Name:
SBR_63_2011_SchillerMerkens.pdf
Beschreibung:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396823 (Verlagsversion)
Beschreibung:
Full text via publisher
OA-Status:

Urheber

ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Bort, Suleika1, Autor
Schiller-Merkens, Simone1, 2, Autor           
Affiliations:
1University of Mannheim, Germany, ou_persistent22              
2Projekte von Gastwissenschaftlern und Postdoc-Stipendiaten, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1214554              

Inhalt

ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Concept, Institutional logic, Organization studies, Positivism, Publish or perish, Uncertainty
 Zusammenfassung: In this paper, we investigate the dynamics in the field of organization studies. We focus on the market for scholarly publishing and trace how many and which kinds of concepts have been developed and diffused in publications over the last 48 years. We argue that scholars in the publishing market must deal with two kinds of uncertainty: uncertainty on the delicate balance of maintaining research that is both novel and attentive to existing schools of thought, and uncertainty related to the heterogeneity of institutional logics that guide research in the field. We propose that concepts are a means of uncertainty reduction for two reasons. First, working with concepts allows considering both novelty and continuity. Second, working with concepts in a way that follows the dominant field logic helps to reduce uncertainty about what is valued as publishable in the field. We find that the number of concept articles in organization studies has increased, particularly concept articles that align with the dominant logic of positivism.

Details

ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2011-10-012011
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1007/BF03396823
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

ausblenden:
Titel: Schmalenbach Business Review
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 63 (4) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 337 - 360 Identifikator: ISSN: 1439-2917
ISSN: 2194-072X