English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Reducing Uncertainty in Scholarly Publishing: Concepts in the Field of Organization Studies, 1960–2008

Bort, S., & Schiller-Merkens, S. (2011). Reducing Uncertainty in Scholarly Publishing: Concepts in the Field of Organization Studies, 1960–2008. Schmalenbach Business Review, 63(4), 337-360. doi:10.1007/BF03396823.

Item is

Files

hide Files
:
SBR_63_2011_SchillerMerkens.pdf (Any fulltext), 271KB
Name:
SBR_63_2011_SchillerMerkens.pdf
Description:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

hide
Locator:
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396823 (Publisher version)
Description:
Full text via publisher
OA-Status:

Creators

hide
 Creators:
Bort, Suleika1, Author
Schiller-Merkens, Simone1, 2, Author           
Affiliations:
1University of Mannheim, Germany, ou_persistent22              
2Projekte von Gastwissenschaftlern und Postdoc-Stipendiaten, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1214554              

Content

hide
Free keywords: Concept, Institutional logic, Organization studies, Positivism, Publish or perish, Uncertainty
 Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the dynamics in the field of organization studies. We focus on the market for scholarly publishing and trace how many and which kinds of concepts have been developed and diffused in publications over the last 48 years. We argue that scholars in the publishing market must deal with two kinds of uncertainty: uncertainty on the delicate balance of maintaining research that is both novel and attentive to existing schools of thought, and uncertainty related to the heterogeneity of institutional logics that guide research in the field. We propose that concepts are a means of uncertainty reduction for two reasons. First, working with concepts allows considering both novelty and continuity. Second, working with concepts in a way that follows the dominant field logic helps to reduce uncertainty about what is valued as publishable in the field. We find that the number of concept articles in organization studies has increased, particularly concept articles that align with the dominant logic of positivism.

Details

hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2011-10-012011
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1007/BF03396823
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

hide
Title: Schmalenbach Business Review
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 63 (4) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 337 - 360 Identifier: ISSN: 1439-2917
ISSN: 2194-072X