English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Millet agriculture dispersed from Northeast China to the Russian Far East: integrating archaeology, genetics, and linguistics

Li, T., Ning, C., Zhushchikhovskaya, I. S., Hudson, M., & Robbeets, M. (2020). Millet agriculture dispersed from Northeast China to the Russian Far East: integrating archaeology, genetics, and linguistics. Archaeological Research in Asia, 22: 100177. doi:10.1016/j.ara.2020.100177.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
shh2533.pdf (Publisher version), 5MB
Name:
shh2533.pdf
Description:
OA
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Li, Tao1, Author           
Ning, Chao1, Author           
Zhushchikhovskaya, Irina S., Author
Hudson, Mark1, Author           
Robbeets, Martine1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Eurasia3angle, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society, ou_2301699              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Millet, Agricultural dispersals, Hongshan culture, Tungusic, Russian Far East, Manchuria
 Abstract: Broomcorn and foxtail millets were being cultivated in the West Liao River basin in Northeast China by at least the sixth millennium BCE. However, when and how millet agriculture spread from there to the north and east remains poorly understood. Here, we trace the dispersal of millet agriculture from Northeast China to the Russian Far East and weigh demic against cultural diffusion as mechanisms for that dispersal. We compare two routes for the spread of millet into the Russian Far East discussed in previous research—an inland route across Manchuria, and a coastal/inland route initially following the Liaodong Peninsula and Yalu River—using an archaeological dataset including millet remains, pottery, stone tools, spindle whorls, jade and figurines. We then integrate the archaeological evidence with linguistic and genetic findings in an approach we term ‘triangulation’. We conclude that an expansion of agricultural societies in Northeast China during the Middle to Late Hongshan (4000–3000 BCE) coincided with the arrival of millet cultivation in eastern Heilongjiang and the Primorye province of the Russian Far East. Our findings support the inland, Manchuria route for the dispersal of millet to the Primorye and suggest that, as well as long-distance cultural exchange, demic diffusion was also involved. Our results are broadly compatible with the farming/language dispersal hypothesis and consistent with a link between the spread of millet farming and proto-Tungusic, the language ancestral to the contemporary Tungusic languages, in late Neolithic Northeast Asia. © 2020 The Authors

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2020-032020-06
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: 21
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2020.100177
Other: shh2533
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show hide
Project name : Eurasia3angle
Grant ID : 646612
Funding program : Horizon 2020 (H2020)
Funding organization : European Commission (EC)

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Archaeological Research in Asia
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Amsterdam : Elsevier
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 22 Sequence Number: 100177 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 2352-2267
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/2352-2267