English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Drones, Discretion, and the Duty to Protect the Right to Life

Beinlich, L. (2019). Drones, Discretion, and the Duty to Protect the Right to Life. German Yearbook of International Law, 62. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3506602.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-A634-3 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-A635-2
Genre: Journal Article
Subtitle : Germany and its Role in the US Drone Programme before the Higher Administrative Court of Münster

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
https://www.gyil.org/ (Publisher version)
Description:
-
Description:
Also published as: MPIL Research Paper, No. 2019-22.

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Beinlich, Leander1, Author              
Affiliations:
1Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Max Planck Society, ou_3029158              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: extraterritorial applicability of fundamental rights; duty to protect the right to life; judicial review in foreign affairs; interaction of domestic law and international law; international humanitarian law; international human rights law; prohibition on the use of force
 Abstract: In 2014, three Yemeni claimants filed an administrative complaint against the German government addressing Germany’s role in the US drone programme. Relying on the right to life under the German Basic Law, the claimants argued that German authorities must prevent the US from using its air base in Ramstein, Germany, for purposes of conducting drone strikes that might unlawfully harm the claimants. On 19th March 2019, the Higher Administrative Court of Münster overruled the court of first instance and partly decided in favour of the claimants. In what is a highly interesting and thought-provoking judgment, the Court not only finds strong reasons to suspect that US drone strikes in Yemen, at least partially, violate international law. Even more, it orders the German government to ‘ascertain’ that the US drone strikes conducted via Ramstein Air Base are compatible with international law and, ‘if necessary’, to ‘work towards’ compliance with international law. Remarkable enough, this outcome is not the only reason why the judgment is worth being discussed: It furthermore raises interesting and difficult questions as to the material and territorial reach of fundamental rights under the German Basic Law, their inter-relation with international law, as well as the scope – and limits – of judicial review in matters of international law and foreign affairs.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2019
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: German Yearbook of International Law
  Abbreviation : GYIL
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 62 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 0344-3094
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/0344-3094