English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Is all formulaic language created equal? Unpacking the processing advantage for different types of formulaic sequences

Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2020). Is all formulaic language created equal? Unpacking the processing advantage for different types of formulaic sequences. Language and Speech, 63(1), 95-122. doi:10.1177/0023830918823230.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Carrol_Conklin_2020_Is all formulaic language created equal.pdf (Publisher version), 159KB
Name:
Carrol_Conklin_2020_Is all formulaic language created equal.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-
:
Carrol-and-Conklin-SUPPLEMENTARY-MATERIALS.docx (Supplementary material), 61KB
Name:
Supplementary materials
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Carrol, Gareth1, Author
Conklin, Kathy2, 3, Author           
Affiliations:
1University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK, ou_persistent22              
2Language Development Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_2340691              
3University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Research into recurrent, highly conventionalized “formulaic” sequences has shown a processing advantage compared to “novel” (non-formulaic) language. Studies of individual types of formulaic sequence often acknowledge the contribution of specific factors, but little work exists to compare the processing of different types of phrases with fundamentally different properties. We use eye-tracking to compare the processing of three types of formulaic phrases—idioms, binomials, and collocations—and consider whether overall frequency can explain the advantage for all three, relative to control phrases. Results show an advantage, as evidenced through shorter reading times, for all three types. While overall phrase frequency contributes much of the processing advantage, different types of phrase do show additional effects according to the specific properties that are relevant to each type: frequency, familiarity, and decomposability for idioms; predictability and semantic association for binomials; and mutual information for collocations. We discuss how the results contribute to our understanding of the representation and processing of multiword lexical units more broadly.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2020-03-01
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1177/0023830918823230
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Language and Speech
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 63 (1) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 95 - 122 Identifier: ISSN: 0023-8309
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925264209