English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  A Comparison of "Pruning" During Multi-Step Planning in Depressed and Healthy Individuals

Faulkner, P., Huys, Q., Renz, D., Eshel, N., Pilling, S., Dayan, P., et al. (submitted). A Comparison of "Pruning" During Multi-Step Planning in Depressed and Healthy Individuals.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-6B70-4 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-6B71-3
Genre: Paper

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Faulkner, P, Author
Huys, QJM, Author
Renz, D, Author
Eshel, N, Author
Pilling, S, Author
Dayan, P1, 2, Author              
Roiser, JP, Author
Affiliations:
1Department of Computational Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_3017468              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, DE, ou_1497794              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Background Real-life decisions are often complex because they involve making sequential choices that constrain future options. We have previously shown that to render such multi-step decisions manageable, people “prune” (i.e. selectively disregard) branches of decision trees that contain negative outcomes. We have theorized that sub-optimal pruning contributes to depression by promoting an oversampling of branches that result in unsavoury outcomes, which results in a negatively-biased valuation of the world. However, no study has tested this theory in depressed individuals. Methods Thirty unmedicated depressed and 31 healthy participants were administered a sequential reinforcement-based decision-making task to determine pruning behaviours, and completed measures of depression and anxiety. Computational, Bayesian and frequentist analyses examined group differences in task performance and relationships between pruning and depressive symptoms. Results Consistent with prior findings, participants robustly pruned branches of decision trees that began with large losses, regardless of the potential utility of those branches. However, there was no group difference in pruning behaviours. Further, there was no relationship between pruning and levels of depression/anxiety. Limitations The relatively small sample size limited the examination of individual differences. The use of other heuristics that are used to render complex decisions feasible, such as memoization and fragmentation, were not examined. Conclusions We found no evidence that sub-optimal pruning is evident in depression. Future research could determine whether maladaptive pruning behaviours are observable in specific sub-groups of depressed patients (e.g. in treatment-resistant individuals), or whether misuse of other heuristics may contribute to depression.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2020-05
 Publication Status: Submitted
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.08.084509
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source

show