English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Subjective Beliefs In, Out, and About Control: A Quantitative Analysis

Mancinelli, F., Roiser, J., & Dayan, P. (submitted). Subjective Beliefs In, Out, and About Control: A Quantitative Analysis.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-9360-7 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-9361-6
Genre: Paper

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Mancinelli, F, Author
Roiser, J, Author
Dayan, P1, 2, Author              
Affiliations:
1Department of Computational Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_3017468              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, Spemannstrasse 38, 72076 Tübingen, DE, ou_1497794              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: A critical facet of adjusting one’s behaviour after succeeding or failing at a task is assigning responsibility for the ultimate outcome. Humans have trait- and state-like tendencies to implicate aspects of their own behaviour (called ‘internal’ ascriptions) or facets of the particular task or Lady Luck (‘chance’). However, how these tendencies interact with actual performance is unclear. We designed a novel task in which subjects had to learn the likelihood of achieving their goals, and the extent to which this depended on their efforts. High internality (Levenson I-score) was associated with decision making patterns that are less vulnerable to failure, and at the same time less oriented to more rewarding achievements. Our computational analyses suggested that this depended heavily on the adjustment in the perceived achievability of riskier goals following failure. We found beliefs about chance not to be explanatory of choice behaviour in our task. Beliefs about powerful others were strong predictors of behaviour, but only when subjects lacked substantial influence over the outcome. Our results provide an evidentiary basis for heuristics and learning differences that underlie the formation and maintenance of control expectations by the self.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2020-06
 Publication Status: Submitted
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.27.115998
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source

show