Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Restraining Free-Riders: The Effects of Actor Types and Decision Rules in the Public Goods Game

Sauermann, J., & Glassmann, U. (2014). Restraining Free-Riders: The Effects of Actor Types and Decision Rules in the Public Goods Game. Rationality and Society, 26(3), 290-319. doi:10.1177/1043463114533073.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
RS_26_2014_Sauermann.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 484KB
Name:
RS_26_2014_Sauermann.pdf
Beschreibung:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463114533073 (Verlagsversion)
Beschreibung:
Full text via publisher
OA-Status:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Sauermann, Jan1, 2, Autor           
Glassmann, Ulrich3, Autor
Affiliations:
1International Max Planck Research School on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1214550              
2University of Cologne, Germany, ou_persistent22              
3University of Konstanz, Germany, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Cooperation, decision-making rule, group behavior, laboratory experiment, social dilemma
 Zusammenfassung: Many experiments comparing individual and group behavior find that groups behave more egoistically than individuals. However, most of these studies do not control for the influence of within-group decision-making rules that might have an important impact on group behavior. In this article, we report findings from laboratory experiments comparing individual and group behavior in a public goods game. We find that rather than cooperation levels differing between individuals and groups per se, the intragroup decision-making rule has an influence on the cooperativeness of groups. Groups decide either by majority or unanimity rule. While groups deciding by majority rule reach roughly the same level of cooperation as individuals, groups deciding by unanimity rule contribute significantly lower amounts to the public good.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2014-07-222014
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: Introduction
Theoretical assumptions about the cooperativeness of individuals and groups
Experimental design and procedure
Experimental results
Conclusion
Acknowledgements
Notes
References
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1177/1043463114533073
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Rationality and Society
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 26 (3) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 290 - 319 Identifikator: ISSN: 1043-4631
ISSN: 1461-7358