English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Old and new approaches to animal cognition: there is not “One Cognition”

Bräuer, J., Hanus, D., Pika, S., Gray, R. D., & Uomini, N. (2020). Old and new approaches to animal cognition: there is not “One Cognition”. Journal of Intelligence, 8030028. doi:10.3390/jintelligence8030028.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-A8C1-2 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-ACEC-F
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
shh2651.pdf (Publisher version), 3MB
Name:
shh2651.pdf
Description:
OA
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Bräuer, Juliane1, Author              
Hanus, Daniel, Author
Pika, Simone, Author
Gray, Russell D.1, Author              
Uomini, Natalie1, Author              
Affiliations:
1Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society, ou_2074311              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: animal cognition; comparative psychology; comparative cognition; animal psychology; animal minds; cognitive evolution
 Abstract: Using the comparative approach, researchers draw inferences about the evolution of cognition. Psychologists have postulated several hypotheses to explain why certain species are cognitively more flexible than others, and these hypotheses assume that certain cognitive skills are linked together to create a generally “smart” species. However, empirical findings suggest that several animal species are highly specialized, showing exceptional skills in single cognitive domains while performing poorly in others. Although some cognitive skills may indeed overlap, we cannot a priori assume that they do across species. We argue that the term “cognition” has often been used by applying an anthropocentric viewpoint rather than a biocentric one. As a result, researchers tend to overrate cognitive skills that are human-like and assume that certain skills cluster together in other animals as they do in our own species. In this paper, we emphasize that specific physical and social environments create selection pressures that lead to the evolution of certain cognitive adaptations. Skills such as following the pointing gesture, tool-use, perspective-taking, or the ability to cooperate evolve independently from each other as a concrete result of specific selection pressures, and thus have appeared in distantly related species. Thus, there is not “one cognition”. Our argument is founded upon traditional Darwinian thinking, which—although always at the forefront of biology—has sometimes been neglected in animal cognition research. In accordance with the biocentric approach, we advocate a broader empirical perspective as we are convinced that to better understand animal minds, comparative researchers should focus much more on questions and experiments that are ecologically valid. We should investigate nonhuman cognition for its own sake, not only in comparison to the human model.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2020-07-02
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: 25
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: 1. Current hypotheses on animal cognition

2. Performing competently–performing poorly: cognitive skills are not necessarily linked together
2.1 Chimpanzee cognition
2.2 Dog cognition
2.3 New caledonian crow cognition

3. When animals outperform humans

4. Ecology, perception, and crucial limitations

5. New challenges in animal cognition
 Rev. Method: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence8030028
Other: shh2651
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Intelligence
  Abbreviation : J. Intell.
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Basel : MDPI
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: 8030028 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 2079-3200
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/2079-3200