日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存
 
 
ダウンロード電子メール
  A comparison of isotope ratio mass spectrometry and cavity ring-down spectroscopy techniques for isotope analysis of fluid inclusion water

De Graaf, S., Vonhof, H. B., Weissbach, T., Wassenburg, J. A., Levy, E. J., Kluge, T., & Haug, G. H. (2020). A comparison of isotope ratio mass spectrometry and cavity ring-down spectroscopy techniques for isotope analysis of fluid inclusion water. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 34(16):. doi:10.1002/rcm.8837.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
アイテムのパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-5A71-5 版のパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-5A72-4
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル

関連URL

表示:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
De Graaf, Stefan1, 著者           
Vonhof, Hubert B.1, 著者           
Weissbach , Therese2, 著者
Wassenburg, Jasper A.1, 著者           
Levy, Elan J.1, 著者           
Kluge , Tobias2, 著者
Haug, Gerald H.1, 著者           
所属:
1Climate Geochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_2237635              
2external, ou_persistent22              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: -
 要旨:
Rationale

Online oxygen (δ18O) and hydrogen (δ2H) isotope analysis of fluid inclusion water entrapped in minerals is widely applied in paleo‐fluid studies. In the state of the art of fluid inclusion isotope research, however, there is a scarcity of reported inter‐technique comparisons to account for possible analytical offsets. Along with improving analytical precisions and sample size limitations, interlaboratory comparisons can lead to a more robust application of fluid inclusion isotope records.
Methods

Mineral samples—including speleothem, travertine, and vein material—were analyzed on two newly setup systems for fluid inclusion isotope analysis to provide an inter‐platform comparison. One setup uses a crusher unit connected online to a continuous‐flow pyrolysis furnace and an isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) instrument. In the other setup, a crusher unit is lined up with a cavity ring‐down spectroscopy (CRDS) system, and water samples are analyzed on a continuous standard water background to achieve precisions on water injections better than 0.1‰ for δ18O values and 0.4‰ for δ2H values for amounts down to 0.2 μL.
Results

Fluid inclusion isotope analyses on the IRMS setup have an average 1σ reproducibility of 0.4‰ and 2.0‰ for δ18O and δ2H values, respectively. The CRDS setup has a better 1σ reproducibility (0.3‰ for δ18O values and 1.1‰ for δ2H values) and also a more rapid sample throughput (<30 min per sample). Fluid inclusion isotope analyses are reproducible at these uncertainties for water amounts down to 0.1 μL on both setups. Fluid inclusion isotope data show no systematic offsets between the setups.
Conclusions

The close match in fluid inclusion isotope results between the two setups demonstrates the high accuracy of the presented continuous‐flow techniques for fluid inclusion isotope analysis. Ideally, experiments such as the one presented in this study will lead to further interlaboratory comparison efforts and the selection of suitable reference materials for fluid inclusion isotopes studies.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語: eng - English
 日付: 2020-08-30
 出版の状態: オンラインで出版済み
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: -
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): ISI: 000553433000002
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8837
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
  その他 : Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.
種別: 学術雑誌
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: New York, NY : John Wiley & Sons
ページ: - 巻号: 34 (16) 通巻号: e8837 開始・終了ページ: - 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): ISSN: 0951-4198
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925574961