日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

  Twelve Years after the Financial Crisis – Too-big-to-fail is still with us. Comments on the Financial Stability Board’s Consultation Report 'Evaluation of the Effects of Too-big-to-fail reforms'

Hellwig, M. F. (2020). Twelve Years after the Financial Crisis – Too-big-to-fail is still with us. Comments on the Financial Stability Board’s Consultation Report 'Evaluation of the Effects of Too-big-to-fail reforms'.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
アイテムのパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-49B2-E 版のパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-49B3-D
資料種別: 成果報告書

ファイル

表示: ファイル

関連URL

表示:
非表示:
URL:
https://www.coll.mpg.de/pdf_dat/2020_24online.pdf (全文テキスト(全般))
説明:
-
OA-Status:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Hellwig, Martin F.1, 著者           
所属:
1Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Society, ou_2173688              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: Financial Stability Board, too-big-to-fail, systemic risk, banking regulation, bank resolution
 JEL: G01 - Financial Crises
 JEL: G18 - Government Policy and Regulation
 JEL: G21 - Banks; Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
 JEL: G28 - Government Policy and Regulation
 JEL: K23 - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law
 要旨: The paper contains comments made on the Financial Stability Board’s (FSB) Consultation Report concerning the success of regulatory reforms since the global financial crisis of 2007-2009. According to these comments, the FSB’s assessment of the role of equity is too narrow, being phrased in terms of bankruptcy avoidance and risk taking incentives, without attention to debt overhang creating distortions in funding choices, as well as the systemic impact of ample equity reducing deleveraging needs after losses and equity contributing to smoothing of lending and asset purchases over time. The FSB’s treatment of systemic risk pays too little attention to mutual interdependence of different parts of the system that is not well captured by linear causal relationships. Finally, the comments point out that bank resolution of systemically important institutions is still not viable, for lack of political acceptance of single-point-of-entry procedures, for lack of funding of banks in resolution (in the EI), for lack of fiscal backstops (in the EU), and for lack of political acceptance of bank resolution with bail-in.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語:
 日付: 2020-10-26
 出版の状態: オンラインで出版済み
 ページ: -
 出版情報: Bonn : Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Discussion Paper 2020/24
 目次: -
 査読: -
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): その他: 2020/24
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物

表示: