日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

  Why do models perform differently on particulate matter over East Asia? A multi-model intercomparison study for MICS-Asia III

Tan, J., Fu, J. S., Carmichael, G. R., Itahashi, S., Tao, Z., Huang, K., Dong, X., Yamaji, K., Nagashima, T., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Lee, H.-J., Lin, C.-Y., Ge, B., Baozhu, M., Zhu, J., & Zhang, M. (2020). Why do models perform differently on particulate matter over East Asia? A multi-model intercomparison study for MICS-Asia III. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 20(12), 7393-7410. doi:10.5194/acp-20-7393-2020.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
アイテムのパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-604B-9 版のパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0007-604C-8
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル

関連URL

表示:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Tan, Jiani1, 著者           
Fu, Joshua S., 著者
Carmichael, Gregory R., 著者
Itahashi, Syuichi, 著者
Tao, Zhining, 著者
Huang, Kan, 著者
Dong, Xinyi, 著者
Yamaji, Kazuyo, 著者
Nagashima, Tatsuya, 著者
Wang, Xuemei, 著者
Liu, Yiming, 著者
Lee, Hyo-Jung, 著者
Lin, Chuan-Yao, 著者
Ge, Baozhu, 著者
Baozhu, Mizuo, 著者
Zhu, Jia, 著者
Zhang, Meigen, 著者
所属:
1Multiphase Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_1826290              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: -
 要旨: This study compares the performance of 12 regional chemical transport models (CTMs) from the third phase of the Model Inter-Comparison Study for Asia (MICS-Asia III) on simulating the particulate matter (PM) over East Asia (EA) in 2010. The participating models include the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Community Multiscale Air Quality (WRF-CMAQ; v4.7.1 and v5.0.2), the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System coupled with CMAQ (RAMS-CMAQ; v4.7.1 and v5.0.2), the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with chemistry (WRF-Chem; v3.6.1 and v3.7.1), Goddard Earth Observing System coupled with chemistry (GEOS-Chem), a non-hydrostatic model coupled with chemistry (NHM-Chem), the Nested Air Quality Prediction Modeling System (NAQPMS) and the NASA-Unified WRF (NU-WRF). This study investigates three model processes as the possible reasons for different model performances on PM. (1) Models perform very differently in the gas–particle conversion of sulfur (S) and oxidized nitrogen (N). The model differences in sulfur oxidation ratio (50 %) are of the same magnitude as that in SO2−4 concentrations. The gas–particle conversion is one of the main reasons for different model performances on fine mode PM. (2) Models without dust emission modules can perform well on PM10 at non-dust-affected sites but largely underestimate (up to 50 %) the PM10 concentrations at dust sites. The implementation of dust emission modules in the models has largely improved the model accuracies at dust sites (reduce model bias to −20 %). However, both the magnitude and distribution of dust pollution are not fully captured. (3) The amounts of modeled depositions vary among models by 75 %, 39 %, 21 % and 38 % for S wet, S dry, N wet and N dry depositions, respectively. Large inter-model differences are found in the washout ratios of wet deposition (at most 170 % in India) and dry deposition velocities (generally 0.3–2 cm s−1 differences over inland regions).

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語: eng - English
 日付: 2020-06-25
 出版の状態: オンラインで出版済み
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: 査読なし
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-7393-2020
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  省略形 : ACP
種別: 学術雑誌
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: Göttingen : Copernicus Publications
ページ: - 巻号: 20 (12) 通巻号: - 開始・終了ページ: 7393 - 7410 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): ISSN: 1680-7316
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/111030403014016