English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  On the reliability of parameter estimates in the first observing run of Advanced LIGO

Kulkarni, S., & Capano, C. (2021). On the reliability of parameter estimates in the first observing run of Advanced LIGO. Physical Review D, 103(10): 104002. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104002.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
2011.13764.pdf (Preprint), 812KB
Name:
2011.13764.pdf
Description:
File downloaded from arXiv at 2020-12-10 07:53
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
:
PhysRevD.103.104002.pdf (Publisher version), 3MB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
PhysRevD.103.104002.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute), MPGR; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Kulkarni, Suman, Author
Capano, Collin1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Observational Relativity and Cosmology, AEI-Hannover, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society, ou_24011              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, gr-qc, Astrophysics, High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, astro-ph.HE
 Abstract: Accurate parameter estimation is key to maximizing the scientific impact of
gravitational-wave astronomy. Parameters of a binary merger are typically
estimated using Bayesian inference. It is necessary to make several assumptions
when doing so, one of which is that the the detectors output stationary
Gaussian noise. We test the validity of these assumptions by performing
percentile-percentile tests in both simulated Gaussian noise and real detector
data in the first observing run of Advanced LIGO (O1). We add simulated signals
to 512s of data centered on each of the three events detected in O1 --
GW150914, GW151012, and GW151226 -- and check that the recovered credible
intervals match statistical expectations. We find that we are able to recover
unbiased parameter estimates in the real detector data, indicating that the
assumption of Gaussian noise does not adversely effect parameter estimates.
However, we also find that both the parallel-tempered emcee sampler emcee_pt
and the nested sampler dynesty struggle to produced unbiased parameter
estimates for GW151226-like signals, even in simulated Gaussian noise. The
emcee_pt sampler does produce unbiased estimates for GW150914-like signals.
This highlights the importance of performing percentile-percentile tests in
different targeted areas of parameter space.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2020-11-272021
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: 11 pages, 4 figures
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: arXiv: 2011.13764
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104002
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Physical Review D
  Other : Phys. Rev. D.
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Lancaster, Pa. : American Physical Society
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 103 (10) Sequence Number: 104002 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 0556-2821
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/111088197762258