English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Repellents have functionally replaced hydrophobins in mediating attachment to a hydrophobic surface and in formation of hydrophobic aerial hyphae in Ustilago maydis.

Teerstra, W., Deelstra, H., Vranes, M., Bohlmann, R., Kahmann, R., Kaemper, J., et al. (2006). Repellents have functionally replaced hydrophobins in mediating attachment to a hydrophobic surface and in formation of hydrophobic aerial hyphae in Ustilago maydis. Microbiology, 152, 3607-12. doi:10.1099/mic.0.29034-0.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Teerstra, Wieke, Author
Deelstra, Heine, Author
Vranes, Miroslav1, Author           
Bohlmann, Ralph, Author
Kahmann, Regine2, Author           
Kaemper, Joerg1, Author           
Woesten, Han, Author
Affiliations:
1Department of Organismic Interactions, Alumni, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Max Planck Society, ou_3266313              
2Emeriti Molecular Phytopathology, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Max Planck Society, ou_3266291              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Ustilago maydis contains one repellent and two class I hydrophobin genes in its genome. The repellent gene rep1 has been described previously. It encodes 11 secreted repellent peptides that result from the cleavage of a precursor protein at KEX2 recognition sites. The hydrophobin gene hum2 encodes a typical class I hydrophobin of 117 aa, while hum3 encodes a hydrophobin that is preceded by 17 repeat sequences. These repeats are separated, like the repellent peptides, by KEX2 recognition sites. Gene hum2, but not hum3, was shown to be expressed in a cross of two compatible wild-type strains, suggesting a role of the former hydrophobin gene in aerial hyphae formation. Indeed, aerial hyphae formation was reduced in a Delta hum2 cross. However, the reduction in aerial hyphae formation was much more dramatic in the Delta rep1 cross. Moreover, colonies of the Delta rep1 cross were completely wettable, while surface hydrophobicity was unaffected and only slightly reduced in the Delta hum2 and the Delta hum2 Delta hum3 cross, respectively. It was also shown that the repellents and not the hydrophobins are involved in attachment of hyphae to hydrophobic Teflon. Deleting either or both hydrophobin genes in the Delta rep1 strains did not further affect aerial hyphae formation, surface hydrophobicity and attachment. From these data it is concluded that hydrophobins of U. maydis have been functionally replaced, at least partially, by repellents.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2006-12
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 295058
DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.29034-0
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Microbiology
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 152 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 3607 - 12 Identifier: -