Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Public Opinion on Welfare State Recalibration in Times of Austerity: Evidence from Survey Experiments

Bremer, B., & Bürgisser, R. (2020). Public Opinion on Welfare State Recalibration in Times of Austerity: Evidence from Survey Experiments. SocArXiv. doi:10.31235/osf.io/uj6eq.

Item is

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/uj6eq (Preprint)
Beschreibung:
Full text via SocArXiv
OA-Status:
Keine Angabe
externe Referenz:
http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0009-F18D-8 (Ergänzendes Material)
Beschreibung:
New source: Bremer, Björn, & Bürgisser, Reto (2023). Public Opinion on Welfare State Recalibration in Times of Austerity: Evidence from Survey Experiments. Political Science Research and Methods, 11(1), 34-52.
OA-Status:
Keine Angabe

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Bremer, Björn1, Autor           
Bürgisser, Reto2, Autor
Affiliations:
1Politische Ökonomie von Wachstumsmodellen, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_2489691              
2Department of Political Science, University of Zurich, Switzerland, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Welfare state, social investment, austerity, public opinion, survey experiments
 Zusammenfassung: In times of austerity and new social risks, fiscal resources are scarce. Governments have to prioritize some social policies over others, which is particularly challenging because most social policies are highly popular. However, existing research only asks about preferences towards individual social policies and fails to capture the citizens’ overall priorities regarding the trade-offs inherent in the multidimensional recalibration of welfare states. We thus study citizens’ priorities with two novel survey experiments in three European countries. We find that the average citizen has an explicit priority order: pensions and education enjoy a high, family policies a medium, and labor market policies a low priority. Yet, party and policy constituencies have different relative priorities. Our findings imply that distributive conflicts in mature welfare states are more about the distribution of resources to specific groups than welfare state support in general, and we point out potential voter coalitions for welfare state recalibration.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2020-07-162020-07-16
 Publikationsstatus: Online veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/uj6eq
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: SocArXiv
Genre der Quelle: Webseite
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: -