English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  The Contribution of EU Law to the Regulation of Online Speech: the Glawischnig-Piesczek Case and what it means for Online Content Regulation

Von Danwitz, L. (2021). The Contribution of EU Law to the Regulation of Online Speech: the Glawischnig-Piesczek Case and what it means for Online Content Regulation. Michigan Technology Law Review, 27(1), 167-211. doi:10.36645/mtlr.27.1.contribution.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Description:
-

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Von Danwitz, Luc1, Author              
Affiliations:
1Public Law, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Max Planck Society, ou_3053334              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Internet regulation in the European Union (EU) is receiving significant attention and criticism in the United States. The European Court of Justice’s (ECJ) judgment in the case Glawischnig-Piesczek v. Facebook Ireland, in which the ECJ found a take-down order against Facebook for defamatory content with global effect permissible under EU law, was closely scrutinized in the United States. These transsystemic debates are valuable but need to be conducted with a thorough understanding of the relevant legal framework and its internal logic. This note aims to provide the context to properly assess the role the ECJ and EU law play in the regulation of online speech. The note argues that the alleged shortcomings of the Glawischnig- Piesczek case are actually the result of a convincing interpretation of the applicable EU law while respecting the prerogatives of the member states in the areas of speech regulation, jurisdiction, and comity. Most of the issues that commentators wanted the ECJ to decide were beyond its reach in this case. The paper argues that EU law’s contribution in the field of online speech regulation should be regarded as a realization of the dangers of illegal online content, resulting in an effective protection of the interests harmed. This implies the rejection of a “whack-a-mole” approach towards illegal online content in favor of more effective ways to protect against the harm caused by illegal online speech. At the same time, the case highlights the necessity to establish a workable theory of jurisdiction and comity in the digital age.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 20212021
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.36645/mtlr.27.1.contribution
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Michigan Technology Law Review
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 27 (1) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 167 - 211 Identifier: -