English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Transition through Automation

Grosse Ruse-Khan, H. (2021). Transition through Automation. In N. Brunn, G. B. Dinwoodie, M. Levin, & A. Ohly (Eds.), Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law - Essays in Honour of Annette Kur (pp. 157-173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Contribution to Festschrift

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3565071 (Preprint)
Description:
Also published as: University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 8/2020 under the title: Automated Copyright Enforcement Online: From Blocking to Monetization of User-Generated Content

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Grosse Ruse-Khan, Henning1, Author              
Affiliations:
1MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society, ou_2035291              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: copyright law, online platforms, algorithmic enforcement, Content ID, monetisation, user rights
 Abstract: Global platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, Instagram or TikTok live on users ‘freely’ sharing content, in exchange for the data generated in the process. Many of these digital market actors nowadays employ automated copyright enforcement tools, allowing those who claim ownership to identify matching content uploaded by users. While most debates on state-sanctioned platform liability and automated private ordering by platforms has focused on the implications of user generated content being blocked, this paper places a spotlight on monetization. Using YouTube’s Content ID as principal example, I show how monetizing user content is by far the norm, and blocking the rare exception. This is not surprising, since both platforms and copyright owners significantly profit from monetization. However, contrasting complex automated enforcement tools such as Content ID against basic principles of copyright law, this paper shows how users loose out when their content is exploited. As aggravating factors, the paper points to far-reaching powers that platforms as ‘functional sovereigns’ wield within their respective domains; and to the fundamentally distinct nature of norms set by these sovereigns. The platform’s application and enforcement of its own rules is hard-coded, immediate and automated: embedded in its infrastructure and code, implemented through automation, and adjudicated in its own courts, platform rules constitute brute facts, directly shaping our reality – hence transforming the nature of law as institutional (that is, socially constructed) facts. The paper concludes by critically reviewing mechanisms to protect users, including those set out in Article 17 of the EU’s Digital Single Market Directive.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2021
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: -
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law - Essays in Honour of Annette Kur
Source Genre: Festschrift
 Creator(s):
Brunn, Niklas1, Editor
Dinwoodie, Graeme B.1, Editor
Levin, Marianne1, Editor
Ohly, Ansgar1, Editor
Affiliations:
1 External Organizations, ou_persistent22            
Publ. Info: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 157 - 173 Identifier: ISBN: 978-1-108-48460-2

Source 2

show
hide
Title: Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
Source Genre: Series
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 55 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -