Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse


  Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis

Porredon, A., Crocce, M., Fosalba, P., Elvin-Poole, J., Rosell, A. C., Cawthon, R., et al. (2021). Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis. Physical Review D, 103(4): 043503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043503.

Item is


show hide
Genre: Journal Article


show Files
hide Files
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis.pdf (Any fulltext), 2MB
File Permalink:
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results Optimizing the lens sample in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis.pdf
MIME-Type / Checksum:
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
Copyright Info:




Porredon, A., Author
Crocce, M., Author
Fosalba, P., Author
Elvin-Poole, J., Author
Rosell, A. Carnero, Author
Cawthon, R., Author
Eifler, T. F., Author
Fang, X., Author
Ferrero, I., Author
Krause, E., Author
MacCrann, N., Author
Weaverdyck, N., Author
Abbott, T. M. C., Author
Aguena, M., Author
Allam, S., Author
Amon, A., Author
Avila, S., Author
Bacon, D., Author
Bertin, E., Author
Bhargava, S., Author
Bridle, S. L., AuthorBrooks, D., AuthorKind, M. Carrasco, AuthorCarretero, J., AuthorCastander, F. J., AuthorChoi, A., AuthorCostanzi, M., Authorda Costa, L. N., AuthorPereira, M. E. S., AuthorVicente, J. De, AuthorDesai, S., AuthorDiehl, H. T., AuthorDoel, P., AuthorDrlica-Wagner, A., AuthorEckert, K., AuthorFerte, A., AuthorFlaugher, B., AuthorFrieman, J., AuthorGarcía-Bellido, J., AuthorGaztanaga, E., AuthorGerdes, D.W., AuthorGiannantonio, T., AuthorGruen, D., AuthorGruendl, R. A., AuthorGschwend, J., AuthorGutierrez, G., AuthorHartley, W. G., AuthorHinton, S. R., AuthorHollowood, D. L., AuthorHonscheid, K., AuthorHoyle, B.1, Author              James, D. J., AuthorJarvis, M., AuthorKuehn, K., AuthorKuropatkin, N., AuthorMaia, M. A. G., AuthorMarshall, J. L., AuthorMenanteau, F., AuthorMiquel, R., AuthorMorgan, R., AuthorPalmese, A., AuthorPandey, S., AuthorPaz-Chinchón, F., AuthorPlazas, A. A., AuthorRodriguez-Monroy, M., AuthorRoodman, A., AuthorSamuroff, S., AuthorSanchez, E., AuthorScarpine, V., AuthorSerrano, S., AuthorSevilla-Noarbe, I., AuthorSmith, M., AuthorSoares-Santos, M., AuthorSuchyta, E., AuthorSwanson, M. E. C., AuthorTarle, G., AuthorTo, C., AuthorVarga, T. N.1, Author              Weller, J.1, Author              Wilkinson, R. D., Author more..
1Optical and Interpretative Astronomy, MPI for Extraterrestrial Physics, Max Planck Society, ou_159895              


Free keywords: -
 Abstract: We investigate potential gains in cosmological constraints from the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing by optimizing the lens galaxy sample selection using information from Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data and assuming the DES Year 1 metacalibration sample for the sources. We explore easily reproducible selections based on magnitude cuts in i-band as a function of (photometric) redshift, z<sub>phot</sub>, and benchmark the potential gains against those using the well-established redMaGiC [E. Rozo et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 461, 1431 (2016)] sample. We focus on the balance between density and photometric redshift accuracy, while marginalizing over a realistic set of cosmological and systematic parameters. Our optimal selection, the MagLim sample, satisfies i<4z<sub>phot</sub>+18 and has ∼30% wider redshift distributions but ∼3.5 times more galaxies than redMaGiC. Assuming a wCDM model (i.e. with a free parameter for the dark energy equation of state) and equivalent scale cuts to mitigate nonlinear effects, this leads to 40% increase in the figure of merit for the pair combinations of Ω<sub>m</sub>, w, and σ<sub>8</sub>, and gains of 16% in σ<sub>8</sub>, 10% in Ω<sub>m</sub>, and 12% in w. Similarly, in ΛCDM, we find an improvement of 19% and 27% on σ<sub>8</sub> and Ω<sub>m</sub>, respectively. We also explore flux-limited samples with a flat magnitude cut finding that the optimal selection, i<22.2, has ∼7 times more galaxies and ∼20% wider redshift distributions compared to MagLim, but slightly worse constraints. We show that our results are robust with respect to the assumed galaxy bias and photometric redshift uncertainties with only moderate further gains from increased number of tomographic bins or the inclusion of bin cross-correlations, except in the case of the flux-limited sample, for which these gains are more significant.


 Dates: 2021-02-01
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.043503
 Degree: -



Legal Case


Project information


Source 1

Title: Physical Review D
  Other : Phys. Rev. D.
Source Genre: Journal
Publ. Info: Lancaster, Pa. : American Physical Society
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 103 (4) Sequence Number: 043503 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 2470-0010