English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Privatization of Biofilm Matrix in Structurally Heterogeneous Biofilms

Otto, S. B., Martin, M., Schaefer, D., Hartmann, R., Drescher, K., Brix, S., et al. (2020). Privatization of Biofilm Matrix in Structurally Heterogeneous Biofilms. MSYSTEMS, 5(4): e00425-20. doi:10.1128/mSystems.00425-20.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Otto, Simon B.1, Author
Martin, Marivic1, Author
Schaefer, Daniel1, Author
Hartmann, Raimo1, Author
Drescher, Knut2, Author           
Brix, Susanne1, Author
Dragos, Anna1, Author
Kovacs, Akos T.1, Author
Affiliations:
1external, ou_persistent22              
2Max Planck Research Group Bacterial Biofilms, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Max Planck Society, ou_3266298              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The self-produced biofilm provides beneficial protection for the enclosed cells, but the costly production of matrix components makes producer cells susceptible to cheating by nonproducing individuals. Despite detrimental effects of nonproducers, biofilms can be heterogeneous, with isogenic nonproducers being a natural consequence of phenotypic differentiation processes. For instance, in Bacillus subtilis biofilm cells differ in production of the two major matrix components, the amyloid fiber protein TasA and exopolysaccharides (EPS), demonstrating different expression levels of corresponding matrix genes. This raises questions regarding matrix gene expression dynamics during biofilm development and the impact of phenotypic nonproducers on biofilm robustness. Here, we show that biofilms are structurally heterogeneous and can be separated into strongly and weakly associated clusters. We reveal that spatiotemporal changes in structural heterogeneity correlate with matrix gene expression, with TasA playing a key role in biofilm integrity and timing of development. We show that the matrix remains partially privatized by the producer subpopulation, where cells tightly stick together even when exposed to shear stress. Our results support previous findings on the existence of "weak points" in seemingly robust biofilms as well as on the key role of linkage proteins in biofilm formation. Furthermore, we provide a starting point for investigating the privatization of common goods within isogenic populations. IMPORTANCE Biofilms are communities of bacteria protected by a self-produced extracellular matrix. The detrimental effects of nonproducing individuals on biofilm development raise questions about the dynamics between community members, especially when isogenic nonproducers exist within wild-type populations. We asked ourselves whether phenotypic nonproducers impact biofilm robustness, and where and when this heterogeneity of matrix gene expression occurs. Based on our results, we propose that the matrix remains partly privatized by the producing subpopulation, since producing cells stick together when exposed to shear stress. The important role of linkage proteins in robustness and development of the structurally heterogeneous biofilm provides an entry into studying the privatization of common goods within isogenic populations.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2020
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: ISI: 000572105700022
DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00425-20
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: MSYSTEMS
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 5 (4) Sequence Number: e00425-20 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 2379-5077