English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Heartbeat and somatosensory perception

Al, E., Iliopoulos, F., Nikulin, V. V., & Villringer, A. (2021). Heartbeat and somatosensory perception. NeuroImage, 238: 118247. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118247.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Al_2021.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
Al_2021.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Gold
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Al, Esra1, 2, 3, Author           
Iliopoulos, Fivos1, 3, Author           
Nikulin, Vadim V.1, 4, Author           
Villringer, Arno1, 2, 3, Author           
Affiliations:
1Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634549              
2MindBrainBody Institute, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany, ou_persistent22              
3Humboldt University Berlin, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Germany, ou_persistent22              
4Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Somatosensory processing; Perceptual awareness; Electrophysiology; Interoception
 Abstract: Our perception of the external world is influenced by internal bodily signals. For example, we recently showed that timing of stimulation along the cardiac cycle and spontaneous fluctuations of heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) amplitudes influence somatosensory perception and the associated neural processing (Al et al., 2020). While cardiac phase affected detection sensitivity and late components of the somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), HEP amplitudes affected detection criterion and both early and late SEP components. In a new EEG study, we investigate whether these results are replicable in a modified paradigm, which includes two succeeding temporal intervals. In one of the intervals, subjects received a weak electrical finger stimulation and reported first whether they detected any stimulation and then allocated the stimulus to one of the two intervals. Our results confirm the previously reported cardiac cycle and prestimulus HEP effects on somatosensory perception and evoked potentials. In addition, we obtained two new findings. Source analyses in this and our original study show that the increased likelihood of conscious perception goes along with HEP fluctuations in parietal and posterior cingulate regions, known to play important roles in interoceptive processes. Furthermore, HEP amplitudes were shown to decrease when subjects engaged in the somatosensory task compared to a resting state condition. Our findings are consistent with the view that HEP amplitudes are a marker of interoceptive (versus exteroceptive) attention and provide a neural underpinning for this view.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2021-06-022021-02-032021-06-062021-06-072021-09
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118247
Other: epub 2021
PMID: 34111514
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: NeuroImage
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Orlando, FL : Academic Press
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 238 Sequence Number: 118247 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 1053-8119
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954922650166