English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  "Capitalism: What has gone wrong?" Who went wrong? Capitalism? The market economy? Governments? "Neoliberal" economics?

Hellwig, M. F. (2021). "Capitalism: What has gone wrong?" Who went wrong? Capitalism? The market economy? Governments? "Neoliberal" economics? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 37(4), 664-677. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grab036.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Capitalism_What has gone wrong-Who went wrong-Capitalism-The market economy-Governments-Neoliberal economics.pdf (Publisher version), 174KB
Name:
Capitalism_What has gone wrong-Who went wrong-Capitalism-The market economy-Governments-Neoliberal economics.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Hybrid
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Hellwig, Martin F.1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Society, ou_2173688              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Capitalism, structural change, executive remuneration, public-sector retrenchment, “efficiency”, symbiosis of economic and political power
 JEL: D30 - General
 JEL: D60 - General
 JEL: D70 - General
 JEL: F60 - General
 JEL: H10 - General
 Abstract: The paper contributes to a symposium of the Oxford Review of Economic Policy on “Capitalism: What has Gone Wrong, What Needs to Change, and How can it be Fixed?”. The analysis starts from the observation that, in the United States, the United Kingdom and continental Europe, widespread discontent has become an important political force. I attribute this discontent to a sense on unfairness in developments of the past few decades. I relate this sense of unfairness to: (i) negative effects of structural change, including joblessness and regional decline, (ii) the observation of extraordinary growth in executive remuneration and financial-sector remuneration, coupled with government bailouts in the global financial crisis, and (iii) changes in public policy and public discourse, with a retrenchment of public services and public investment, except for bailouts and a focus on “efficiency”, the meaning of which is driven by the perceptions of corporate executives rather than standard welfare economics. To capture these developments, one needs to think about “capitalism” in the sense of French “capitalism” or German “Kapitalismus”, with a focus on the symbiosis of wealth and power, including the elimination of competition, rather than the English sense of merely another term for the market economy.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2021-082021-11-08
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grab036
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Oxford Review of Economic Policy
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 37 (4) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 664 - 677 Identifier: -