English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Determination of the spin Hall angle by the inverse spin Hall effect, device level ferromagnetic resonance, and spin torque ferromagnetic resonance: A comparison of methods

Ben-Shalom, R., Bernstein, N., Parkin, S. S. P., Yang, S.-H., & Capua, A. (2021). Determination of the spin Hall angle by the inverse spin Hall effect, device level ferromagnetic resonance, and spin torque ferromagnetic resonance: A comparison of methods. Applied Physics Letters, 119(4): 042401. doi:10.1063/5.0057192.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
5.0057192.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
5.0057192.pdf
Description:
Archivkopie
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Private
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
2021
Copyright Info:
The Authors, Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0057192 (Publisher version)
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Not specified

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Ben-Shalom, Ranen1, Author
Bernstein, Nirel1, Author
Parkin, Stuart S. P.2, Author                 
Yang, See-Hun1, Author
Capua, Amir1, Author
Affiliations:
1external, ou_persistent22              
2Nano-Systems from Ions, Spins and Electrons, Max Planck Institute of Microstructure Physics, Max Planck Society, ou_3287476              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: MAGNITUDE Physics;
 Abstract: The spin torque ferromagnetic resonance (STFMR) is one of the popular methods for measurement of the spin Hall angle, θSH. However, in order to accurately determine θSH from STFMR measurements, the acquired data must be carefully analyzed. The resonance linewidth should be determined to an accuracy of a fraction of an Oe, while the dynamical interaction leading to the measured response consists of the conventional field-induced ferromagnetic resonance (FMR), the spin-torque induced FMR, and the inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE). Additionally, the signal often deteriorates when DC is passed through the device. In this work, we compare the STFMR method with two other FMR-based methods that are used to extract θSH. The first is a device-level FMR, and the second is based on the ISHE. We identify artifacts that are caused by the noise floor of the instrumentation that make the measurement of θSH illusive even when the signal to noise ratio seems to be reasonable. Additionally, we estimate a 10% error in θSH that results from neglecting the magnetic anisotropies as in conventional measurements. Overall, we find the STFMR to be the most robust of the three methods despite the complexity of the interaction taking place therein. The conclusions of our work lead to a more accurate determination of θSH and will assist in the search of novel materials for energy efficient spin-based applications.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2021-07-272021-07-26
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: 7
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: ISI: 000678596500003
DOI: 10.1063/5.0057192
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Applied Physics Letters
  Abbreviation : Appl. Phys. Lett.
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Melville, NY : American Institute of Physics
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 119 (4) Sequence Number: 042401 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 0003-6951
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954922836223