English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Toward cumulative cognitive science: a comparison of meta-analysis, mega-analysis, and hybrid approaches

Koile, E., & Cristia, A. (2021). Toward cumulative cognitive science: a comparison of meta-analysis, mega-analysis, and hybrid approaches. Open mind: discoveries in cognitive science, 5 (2022): 00048, pp. 154-173. doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00048.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
shh3034.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
shh3034.pdf
Description:
OA
OA-Status:
Gold
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
:
shh3034pre.pdf (Preprint), 2MB
Name:
shh3034pre.pdf
Description:
OA. - uncorrected proof
OA-Status:
Green
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Description:
(last seen: April 2023)
OA-Status:
Not specified
Locator:
Appendix A-C (Supplementary material)
Description:
pdf. - (last seen: April 2023)
OA-Status:
Not specified

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Koile, Ezequiel1, Author           
Cristia, Alejandrina, Author
Affiliations:
1Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society, ou_2074311              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: cumulative science, open science, meta-analyses, mega-analyses, data simulation, fixed effects, random effects
 Abstract: There is increasing interest in cumulative approaches to science, in which instead of analyzing the results of individual papers separately, we integrate information qualitatively or quantitatively. One such approach is meta-analysis, which has over 50 years of literature supporting its usefulness, and is becoming more common in cognitive science. However, changes in technical possibilities by the widespread use of Python and R make it easier to fit more complex models, and even simulate missing data. Here we recommend the use of mega-analyses (based on the aggregation of data sets collected by independent researchers) and hybrid meta- mega-analytic approaches, for cases where raw data is available for some studies. We illustrate the three approaches using a rich test-retest data set of infants’ speech processing as well as synthetic data. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of the three approaches from the viewpoint of a cognitive scientists contemplating their use, and limitations of this article, to be addressed in future work.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2021-11-25
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: 20
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: Introduction
- Study Case: Reliability of Infant Speech Perception Measures
- Alternatives to Meta-analyses: Mega-analyses, IPD Meta-analyses, and Hybrid Approaches
The present study
- A Brief Primer on Test-Retest Infant Speech Perception
- Modeling
Experiment 1: Natural data
Experiment 2: Synthetic data
General discussion
- Potential Limitations
Conclusion
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1162/opmi_a_00048
Other: shh3034
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science
  Other : Open mind
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Cambridge, Mass. : The MIT Press
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 5 (2022) Sequence Number: 00048 Start / End Page: 154 - 173 Identifier: ISSN: 2470-2986
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/2470-2986