English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Contested science: Individuals with higher metacognitive insight into interpretation of evidence are less likely to polarize

Said, N., Fischer, H., & Anders, G. (2022). Contested science: Individuals with higher metacognitive insight into interpretation of evidence are less likely to polarize. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 668-680. doi:10.3758/s13423-021-01993-y.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Said2022_Article_ContestedScienceIndividualsWit.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
Said2022_Article_ContestedScienceIndividualsWit.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-
:
13423_2021_1993_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (Supplementary material), 39KB
Name:
13423_2021_1993_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01993-y (Publisher version)
Description:
-
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Said, Nadia, Author
Fischer, Helen1, Author                 
Anders, Gerrit, Author
Affiliations:
1Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Max Planck Society, ou_2074286              

Content

show

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.3758/s13423-021-01993-y
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 29 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 668 - 680 Identifier: -