English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  No evidence for embodiment: The motor system is not needed to keep action words in working memory

Montero-Melis, G., Van Paridon, J., Ostarek, M., & Bylund, E. (2022). No evidence for embodiment: The motor system is not needed to keep action words in working memory. Cortex, 150, 108-125. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2022.02.006.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
MonteroMelis_etal_2022_No evidence for embodiment.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
MonteroMelis_etal_2022_No evidence for embodiment.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
data, analysis scripts, and appendices (Supplementary material)
Description:
-
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Montero-Melis, Guillermo1, 2, Author           
Van Paridon, Jeroen3, Author           
Ostarek, Markus1, Author           
Bylund, Emamuel2, 4, Author
Affiliations:
1Neurobiology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792551              
2Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden, ou_persistent22              
3Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792545              
4Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch South-Africa, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Increasing evidence implicates the sensorimotor systems with high-level cognition, but the extent to which these systems play a functional role remains debated. Using an elegant design, Shebani and Pulvermüller (2013) reported that carrying out a demanding rhythmic task with the hands led to selective impairment of working memory for hand-related words (e.g., clap), while carrying out the same task with the feet led to selective memory impairment for foot-related words (e.g., kick). Such a striking double dissociation is acknowledged even by critics to constitute strong evidence for an embodied account of working memory. Here, we report on an attempt at a direct replication of this important finding. We followed a sequential sampling design and stopped data collection at N=77 (more than five times the original sample size), at which point the evidence for the lack of the critical selective interference effect was very strong (BF01 = 91). This finding constitutes strong evidence against a functional contribution of the motor system to keeping action words in working memory. Our finding fits into the larger emerging picture in the field of embodied cognition that sensorimotor simulations are neither required nor automatic in high-level cognitive processes, but that they may play a role depending on the task. Importantly, we urge researchers to engage in transparent, high-powered, and fully pre-registered experiments like the present one to ensure the field advances on a solid basis.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022-03-112022
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.02.006
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Cortex
  Other : Cortex
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 150 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 108 - 125 Identifier: ISSN: 0010-9452
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925393344