Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Good Scientific Practice and Academic Reviews

Hörnle, T. (2021). Good Scientific Practice and Academic Reviews. Criminal Law Forum, 32(4), 531-541. doi:10.1007/s10609-021-09424-2.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
Hörnle2021_Article_GoodScientificPracticeAndAcade.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 176KB
Name:
Hörnle2021_Article_GoodScientificPracticeAndAcade.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-021-09424-2 (beliebiger Volltext)
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Hörnle, Tatjana1, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Criminal Law, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Max Planck Society, ou_2489694              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Academic reviews (hereinafter “reviews”) are an integral part of legal journals. While their purpose and usefulness are at times disputed, all sub-disciplines of legal studies nevertheless argue in equal measure that a lack of substantial academic exchange by way of reviews would result in the impoverishment of scientific discourse. In German criminal law scholarship, two recent cases have sparked debate about whether certain rules should govern the publication of such reviews. The following remarks are intended to provide a thought-provoking impulse on the matter.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2021-11-112021-11-11
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1007/s10609-021-09424-2
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Criminal Law Forum
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Springer
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 32 (4) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 531 - 541 Identifikator: ISSN: 1572-9850