English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  The orbitofrontal cortex is necessary for forming outcome-specific representations during learning Add to Itinerary

Costa, K., Scholz, R., Lloyd, K., Gardner, M., Dayan, P., & Schoenbaum, G. (2021). The orbitofrontal cortex is necessary for forming outcome-specific representations during learning Add to Itinerary. Poster presented at 50th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience (Neuroscience 2021).

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Costa, KM, Author
Scholz, R1, 2, Author              
Lloyd, K1, 2, Author              
Gardner, MP, Author
Dayan, P1, 2, Author              
Schoenbaum, G, Author
Affiliations:
1Department of Computational Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_3017468              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is necessary for using learned representations of outcomes to guide behavior, i.e. model-based cognition. For example, lesions of the OFC have long been known to impair changes in conditioned responding following reinforcer devaluation. These findings, among others, have fueled the hypothesis that the OFC contributes to the use of mental representations that link cues to the incentive properties of outcomes and support inferential thinking (which is necessary for reinforcer devaluation effects). However, it is unclear whether the OFC is necessary for creating such representations or only for their use in guiding subsequent decision making. To answer this question, we conducted a simple experiment in which we used high-potency chemogenetics to inactivate OFC in rats only during the first, rather than in the final, phase of an outcome-specific Pavlovian reinforcer devaluation task. Rats were conditioned to associate two cues with two different rewards, during which OFC was inactivated in the experimental group. Subsequently, one reward was devalued by pairing with LiCl, and, finally, responding to the two cues was assessed in an extinction test. During conditioning, groups showed robust learning to both cues, although the experimental group responded less in the final two sessions. Both groups also similarly reduced consumption of the outcome paired with illness in taste aversion training. However, in the probe test, rats in the experimental group responded equally to cues predicting the devalued versus the non-devalued outcome. Importantly, they suppressed responding to both cues, indicating a loss in response specificity rather than an abolishment of devaluation effects. One interpretation is that, without OFC, rats were still able to form a model, but one without outcome-specific information. Therefore, transient and reversible OFC inactivation during conditioning affected the rats’ ability to use the learned information to support selective response changes in the probe test. This result implicates OFC in the formation of appropriate model-based and outcome-specific representations during cue-outcome learning.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2021-11
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: -
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: 50th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience (Neuroscience 2021)
Place of Event: -
Start-/End Date: 2021-11-08 - 2021-11-11

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: 50th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience (Neuroscience 2021)
Source Genre: Proceedings
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: P793.11 Start / End Page: - Identifier: -