English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Firm Foundations: The Statistical Footprint of Multinational Corporations as a Problem for Political Economy

Ergen, T., Kohl, S., & Braun, B. (2021). Firm Foundations: The Statistical Footprint of Multinational Corporations as a Problem for Political Economy. MPIfG Discussion Paper, 21/5.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
mpifg_dp21_5.pdf (Any fulltext), 3MB
Name:
mpifg_dp21_5.pdf
Description:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Not specified
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-79D6-D (Supplementary material)
Description:
New source: Ergen, Timur, Kohl, Sebastian, & Braun, Benjamin (2023). Firm Foundations: The Statistical Footprint of Multinational Corporations as a Problem for Political Economy. Competition & Change, 27(1), 44-73.
OA-Status:
Not specified

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Ergen, Timur1, Author           
Kohl, Sebastian1, 2, Author           
Braun, Benjamin1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Soziologie des Marktes, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1214556              
2John F. Kennedy Institute for North American Studies, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: comparative methodology, comparative political economy, economic indicators, financialization, France, globalization, growth models, multinational corporations, Sweden
 Abstract: The discipline of comparative political economy (CPE) relies heavily on aggregate, country-level economic indicators. However, the practices of multinational corporations have increasingly undermined this approach to measurement. The problem of indicator drift is well-documented by a growing critical literature and calls for systematic methodological attention in CPE. We present the case for a rocky but ultimately rewarding middle road between indicator fatalism and indicator faith. We illustrate our argument by examining two important cases – Sweden’s recent export success and the financialization of non-financial corporations in France. A careful parsing of the data suggests corrections to common characterizations of the two cases. Swedish exports have been reshaped by intragroup trade among foreign subsidiaries of domestic corporations. The growth of financial assets held by French firms is attributable to the growth of foreign direct investment and to cumulative revaluation effects, while what remains of financialization is concentrated among the very largest firms. Based on these findings, we propose a methodological routine that parses data by zooming in on the qualitative specifics of countries, sectors, and firms, while using all available options for disaggregation.
 Abstract: Die vergleichende politische Ökonomie (CPE) stützt sich in hohem Maße auf aggregierte, ländervergleichende Wirtschaftsindikatoren. Die Praktiken multinationaler Unternehmen haben diesen Ansatz jedoch zunehmend unterminiert. Das Problem abdriftender Indikatoren wird durch eine wachsende kritische Literatur gut dokumentiert und erfordert eine systematische methodische Antwort. Wir plädieren für einen Mittelweg zwischen Indikator-Fatalismus und Indikator-Glauben und veranschaulichen unser Argument anhand von zwei wichtigen Fällen – Schwedens jüngstem Exporterfolg und der Finanzialisierung von nichtfinanziellen Unternehmen in Frankreich. Eine sorgfältige Analyse der Daten zeigt, dass der Handel zwischen ausländischen Tochtergesellschaften inländischer Unternehmen die schwedische Exportstatistik prägt und dass das Wachstum der von französischen Unternehmen gehaltenen Finanzaktiva auf ausländische Direktinvestitionen und kumulative Bewertungseffekte zurückzuführen und außerdem auf multinationale Großunternehmen konzentriert ist. Methodisch schlagen wir die routinemäßige Rückbindung vergleichender Analysen an die qualitativen Besonderheiten von Ländern, Sektoren und Unternehmen vor sowie eine verstärkte Nutzung verfügbarer Möglichkeiten zur Disaggregation.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2021-05
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: IV, 34
 Publishing info: Köln : Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung
 Table of Contents: Contents

1 Introduction

2 The problems with measuring “the economy”
Indicator critique in neighboring fields
Four major fields of indicator problems

3 Growth models, export indicators, and the globalization of production
Macroeconomic pattern recognition in the growth model literature
The rise of merchanting in Sweden’s trade data
The growth of merchanting as a problem for data legibility
The decreasing value of derived indicators

4 Not so financialized after all? Firm financialization in France
Disaggregating financial assets: components, valuation, concentration
Financial income: From gross to net

5 Methodological ways forward: Zoom in and disaggregate

6 Conclusion

References
 Rev. Type: Internal
 Identifiers: -
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: MPIfG Discussion Paper
Source Genre: Series
 Creator(s):
MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, Editor              
Affiliations:
-
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 21/5 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 0944-2073 (Print)
ISSN: 1864-4325 (Internet)