English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Unbiased post-error slowing in interference tasks: A confound and a simple solution

Derrfuss, J., Danielmeier, C., Klein, T. A., Fischer, A. G., & Ullsperger, M. (2021). Unbiased post-error slowing in interference tasks: A confound and a simple solution. Behavior Research Methods. doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01673-8.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Derrfuss_2021.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
Derrfuss_2021.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Derrfuss, Jan1, Author
Danielmeier, Claudia1, Author
Klein, Tilmann A.2, 3, 4, Author              
Fischer, Adrian G.2, 5, Author
Ullsperger, Markus2, 3, Author
Affiliations:
1School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom, ou_persistent22              
2Institute of Psychology, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany, ou_persistent22              
3Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany, ou_persistent22              
4Department Neurology, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634549              
5Department of Education and Psychology, FU Berlin, Germany, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Action errors; Cognitive control; Performance monitoring; Post-error adaptations
 Abstract: We typically slow down after committing an error, an effect termed post-error slowing (PES). Traditionally, PES has been calculated by subtracting post-correct from post-error RTs. Dutilh et al. (Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(3), 208-216, 2012), however, showed PES values calculated in this way are potentially biased. Therefore, they proposed to compute robust PES scores by subtracting pre-error RTs from post-error RTs. Based on data from a large-scale study using the flanker task, we show that both traditional and robust PES estimates can be biased. The source of the bias are differential imbalances in the percentage of congruent vs. incongruent post-correct, pre-error, and post-error trials. Specifically, we found that post-correct, pre-error, and post-error trials were more likely to be congruent than incongruent, with the size of the imbalance depending on the trial type as well as the length of the response-stimulus interval (RSI). In our study, for trials preceded by a 700-ms RSI, the percentages of congruent trials were 62% for post-correct trials, 66% for pre-error trials, and 56% for post-error trials. Relative to unbiased estimates, these imbalances inflated traditional PES estimates by 37% (9 ms) and robust PES estimates by 42% (16 ms) when individual-participant means were calculated. When individual-participant medians were calculated, the biases were even more pronounced (40% and 50% inflation, respectively). To obtain unbiased PES scores for interference tasks, we propose to compute unweighted individual-participant means by initially calculating mean RTs for congruent and incongruent trials separately, before averaging congruent and incongruent mean RTs to calculate means for post-correct, pre-error and post-error trials.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2021-07-012021-10-28
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01673-8
Other: online ahead of print
PMID: 34713426
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show hide
Project name : -
Grant ID : KL 2337/2-1, KL 2337/2-3, UL196/3-1, UL196/3-3
Funding program : -
Funding organization : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Behavior Research Methods
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Austin, TX : Psychonomic Society
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 1554-3528
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/1554-3528