English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Seeing me, seeing you: Testing competing accounts of assumed similarity in personality judgments

Thielmann, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Zettler, I. (2020). Seeing me, seeing you: Testing competing accounts of assumed similarity in personality judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(1), 172-198. doi:10.1037/bul0000217.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000217 (Any fulltext)
Description:
-

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Thielmann, Isabel1, Author              
Hilbig, Benjamin E., Author
Zettler, Ingo, Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: A recurrent observation in personality judgments is that individuals’ ratings of others’ personalities are positively linked to their self-description, and that such “assumed similarity” effects appear to be trait-specific. However, the extent of and explanations for assumed similarity have been addressed only insufficiently. To close this gap, we first provide a meta-analytic summary of evidence on assumed similarity of basic personality traits. More importantly, we then critically test different theoretical accounts of assumed similarity (i.e., lack of information, relation to personal values, and known/spurious similarity) in nine studies. Specifically, we investigated assumed similarity of the HEXACO personality traits among strangers, using tailored experimental tests tackling the different theoretical accounts. Across studies, we consistently found the strongest assumed similarity effects for those traits being most strongly linked to personal values: Honesty-Humility and (albeit somewhat weaker) Openness to Experience. For the remaining traits, no consistent evidence for assumed similarity occurred, even when raters had very limited information about the target person. This contradicts that assumed similarity reflects a lack-of-information effect. In turn, the findings could also neither be accounted for by actual similarity, nor by a shared group membership (i.e., spurious similarity) between rater and target. Overall, our studies support the idea that assumed similarity of basic traits is closely tied to personal values and suggest that this finding is attributable to the high personal relevance of value-related traits. This implies that assumed similarity reflects the assumption that others share basic parts of one’s identity, even if these others are complete strangers.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2020
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1037/bul0000217
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Washington : American Psychological Association (PsycARTICLES)
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 118 (1) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 172 - 198 Identifier: ISSN: 0022-3514
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925416978