Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  The ConTraSt database for analysing and comparing empirical studies of consciousness theories

Yaron, I., Melloni, L., Pitts, M., & Mudrik, L. (2022). The ConTraSt database for analysing and comparing empirical studies of consciousness theories. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 593-604. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01284-5.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Yaron, Itay1, Autor
Melloni, Lucia2, 3, Autor                 
Pitts, Michael4, Autor
Mudrik, Liad1, 5, Autor
Affiliations:
1Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, ou_persistent22              
2Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2421697              
3Department of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA, ou_persistent22              
4Department of Psychology, Reed College, Portland, OR, USA, ou_persistent22              
5School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Consciousness, Databases, Human behaviour
 Zusammenfassung: Understanding how consciousness arises from neural activity remains one of the biggest challenges for neuroscience. Numerous theories have been proposed in recent years, each gaining independent empirical support. Currently, there is no comprehensive, quantitative and theory-neutral overview of the field that enables an evaluation of how theoretical frameworks interact with empirical research. We provide a bird’s eye view of studies that interpreted their findings in light of at least one of four leading neuroscientific theories of consciousness (N = 412 experiments), asking how methodological choices of the researchers might affect the final conclusions. We found that supporting a specific theory can be predicted solely from methodological choices, irrespective of findings. Furthermore, most studies interpret their findings post hoc, rather than a priori testing critical predictions of the theories. Our results highlight challenges for the field and provide researchers with an open-access website (https://ContrastDB.tau.ac.il) to further analyse trends in the neuroscience of consciousness.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2021-06-162021-12-172022-02-112022-04
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01284-5
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Nature Human Behaviour
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: London : Nature Research
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 6 Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 593 - 604 Identifikator: ISSN: 2397-3374
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/2397-3374