English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  The well-preserved Late Neolithic dolmen burial of Oberbipp, Switzerland: construction, use, and post-depositional processes

Ramstein, M., Steuri, N., Brönnimann, D., Rentzel, P., Cornelissen, M., Schimmelpfennig, D., et al. (2022). The well-preserved Late Neolithic dolmen burial of Oberbipp, Switzerland: construction, use, and post-depositional processes. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 42: 103397. doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103397.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Ramstein_Well-preserved_JArchSciRep_2022.pdf (Publisher version), 35MB
Name:
Ramstein_Well-preserved_JArchSciRep_2022.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Hybrid
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
2022
Copyright Info:
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/).

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Ramstein, Marianne, Author
Steuri, Noah, Author
Brönnimann, David, Author
Rentzel, Philippe, Author
Cornelissen, Marcel, Author
Schimmelpfennig, Dirk, Author
Anselmetti, Flavio S., Author
Häberle, Simone, Author
Vandorpe, Patricia, Author
Siebke, Inga, Author
Furtwängler, Anja, Author
Szidat, Sönke, Author
Hafner, Albert, Author
Krause, Johannes1, 2, Author                 
Lösch, Sandra, Author
Affiliations:
1Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society, ou_2074310              
2MHAAM, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society, ou_2541699              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Dolmen, Collective burial, Late Neolithic, Megalithic funerary monument, Construction history, Landscape, Physical anthropology, Palaeogenetics, Bioarchaeology
 Abstract: Excavation of the Late Neolithic dolmen of Oberbipp BE, Steingasse in the Swiss Central Plateau provided a unique opportunity for a comprehensive study of the archaeological and anthropological evidence. In multidisciplinary studies, we investigated the processes at work during construction, use, and abandonment of the megalithic structure, as well as the dietary habits, subsistence strategy, and possible mobility of the Neolithic population. Archaeological methods included micromorphology, archaeobiology, typology, use-wear analysis, and geology. The anthropological investigation was complemented by an analysis of stable isotope ratios and palaeogenetics. Local topography and the cover of alluvial sediments ensured an extraordinary conservation of the monument. It allowed the preservation of the human remains of at least 42 individuals of both sexes and all ages. The observation of the sedimentary and post-depositional processes, supplemented by an extensive series of radiocarbon dates, allowed us to reconstruct the history of the dolmen in its environment and the definition of at least two deposition phases. We found genetic evidence of lactase intolerance, a local population with a mixed ancestry of early Anatolian farmers and Western hunter-gatherers, and a crop-based diet. Sparse remains of a nearby Late Neolithic settlement sustain the interpretation that this is the burial site of a local farming community. Evidence of higher mobility of females and kinship over three generations solely in the paternal line suggests a virilocal community. Bone-altering pathologies support the assumption of a caring society.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022-03-052022-04
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: 17
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: 1. Introduction
1.1. Context
1.2. Discovery and excavation
1.3. Topography and geology
1.4. Aim of the study
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Archaeology
2.2. Soil micromorphology and geology
2.3. Archaeobotany and archaeozoology
2.4. Anthropology and molecular genetics
2.5. Radiocarbon dating
3. Results
3.1. Site occupation
3.2. The monument
3.3. The burials
3.4. Associated artefacts
3.5. Archaeozoology and archaeobotany
4. Discussion
4.1. Limitations of the study
4.2. Landscape history
4.3. The regional burial tradition in the late fourth millennium
4.4. Construction and use of the monument
4.5. Standing stones and further monuments
4.6. Animal activity, human disturbances, erosion, and destruction
4.7. Population and mobility
4.8. Conclusions
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103397
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 42 Sequence Number: 103397 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 2352-409X