English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Indo-European loanwords and exchange in Bronze Age Central and East Asia

Bjorn, R. (2022). Indo-European loanwords and exchange in Bronze Age Central and East Asia. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 5: e23. doi:10.1017/ehs.2022.16.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
shh3207.pdf (Publisher version), 539KB
Name:
shh3207.pdf
Description:
OA
OA-Status:
Gold
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
:
shh3207pre.pdf (Preprint), 2MB
Name:
shh3207pre.pdf
Description:
Accepted manuscript. - OA
OA-Status:
Green
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Bjorn, Rasmus1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society, ou_2074312              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Historical linguistics; archaeology; genetics; Bronze Age; Central Asia; loanwords; Afanasievo; Okunevo; Andronovo; Seima-Turbino; Indo-European; Uralic; Turkic; Old Chinese
 Abstract: Loanword analysis is a unique contribution of historical linguistics to our understanding of prehistoric cultural interfaces. As language reflects the lives of its speakers, the substantiation of loanwords draws on the composite evidence from linguistic as well as auxiliary data from archaeology and genetics through triangulation. The Bronze Age of Central Asia is in principle linguistically mute, but a host of recent independent observations that tie languages, cultures and genetics together in various ways invites a comprehensive reassessment of six highly diagnostic loanwords (‘seven’, ‘name/fame’, ‘sister-in-law’, ‘honey’, ‘metal’ and ‘horse’) that are associated with the Bronze Age. Moreover, they are shared between Indo-European, Uralic, Turkic and sometimes Old Chinese. The successful identification of the interfaces for these loanwords can help settle longstanding debates on languages, migrations and the items themselves. Each item is analysed using the comparative method with reference to the archaeological record to assess the plausibility of a transfer. I argue that the six items can be dated to have entered Central and East Asian languages from immigrant Indo-European languages spoken in the Afanasievo and Andronovo cultures, including a novel source for the ‘horse’ in Old Chinese.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022-04-22
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: 24
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: Introduction
- Uralic
- Turkic and wider Transeurasian
- Chinese and wider Sino-Tibetan
- Indo-European languages in ancient Central Asia
-- Indirectly documented languages
-- The early archaeological cultures: Afanasievo and Okunevo
-- Structure of the argument
Method
- The comparative method
- Loanwords
- Data triangulation
- Methodological protocol
Data and results
- Seven
- Name and fame
- Sister-in-law
- Honey
- Gold, bronze, and copper
- Horse
Discussion
- Seven
- Name-fame
- Sister-in-law
- Honey
- Gold, copper, bronze
- Horse (and chariot)
- The origin of the Tocharian languages
Conclusion
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2022.16
Other: shh3207
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Evolutionary Human Sciences
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 5 Sequence Number: e23 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 2513-843X
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/2513-843X