English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
 Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary
  Ten steps toward a better personality science – A rejoinder to the comments

Leising, D., Thielmann, I., Glöckner, A., Gärtner, A., & Schönbrodt, F. (2022). Ten steps toward a better personality science – A rejoinder to the comments. Personality Science, (3): e7961. doi:10.5964/ps.v3i.

Item is

 

show all hide all

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-699E-F Version Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000E-5BA1-6
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
7961-Article-71785-4-10-20220506.pdf (Any fulltext), 202KB
View   Save
File Permalink:
https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-69A0-B
Name:
7961-Article-71785-4-10-20220506.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Not specified
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
View
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, CC BY 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original work is properly cited.
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Leising, Daniel, Author
Thielmann, Isabel1, Author           
Glöckner, Andreas, Author
Gärtner, Anne, Author
Schönbrodt, Felix, Author
Affiliations:
1Independent Research Group: Personality, Identity, and Crime, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, Max Planck Society, ou_3365073              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: We respond to the comments (https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.9227) on our “Ten Steps” paper (https://doi.org/10.5964/ps.6029), focusing on the most prominent themes: (1) What motivates scientists?, (2) Consensus-building (Is our field ready? May there be adverse side-effects? How shall we do it?), (3) How may institutional change be facilitated?, (4) Diversity (of participants, stimuli, methodology, measures, and among researchers), (5) The reliability of our proposed scoring system, and (6) The real-world relevance of personality research. We stand by our call for more concerted consensus-building and offer a few clarifications in this regard. We also issue four

specific calls to action to our colleagues in the field: (a) specify legitimate paths to greater

consensus, (b) explicate what constitutes good “qualitative” research, (c) help establish a widely used, public domain item database, and (d) determine what the most important contemporary goals of personality research are.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2022-05-06
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.5964/ps.v3i
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Personality Science
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: (3) Sequence Number: e7961 Start / End Page: - Identifier: -